Denton W H, Patterson J E, Van Meir E S
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 1997 Jan;23(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00232.x.
The DSM has largely become the common language of behavioral health which its authors intended. Although family systems theory resulted in part from the study of major mental illness, it later became distanced from considerations of individual psychopathology. No studies have assessed current practices and views within the field of family therapy on teaching students the use of the DSM. Member training programs of the Education and Training Council of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy were surveyed regarding their practices in teaching the DSM. Seventy-nine of 177 surveys (45%) were returned. Ninety-one percent of these programs offered training in the DSM, and in 93% of those such training was mandatory. Written comments indicated that pragmatic concerns about students being able to speak a common language with other behavioral health providers were among the primary reasons for teaching the DSM.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)在很大程度上已成为其作者所期望的行为健康领域的通用语言。尽管家庭系统理论部分源于对严重精神疾病的研究,但后来它与个体精神病理学的考量渐行渐远。尚无研究评估家庭治疗领域目前在教授学生使用DSM方面的实践和观点。针对美国婚姻与家庭治疗协会教育与培训委员会成员培训项目在教授DSM方面的实践进行了调查。177份调查问卷中有79份(45%)被收回。这些项目中有91%提供了关于DSM的培训,其中93%的此类培训是强制性的。书面评论表明,让学生能够与其他行为健康提供者使用通用语言这一务实考量是教授DSM的主要原因之一。