Suppr超能文献

[从仲裁服务和专家委员会的角度看医学专家评估与民法及刑法]

[Medical expert assessment and civil and criminal law from the viewpoint of arbitration services and the expert committee].

作者信息

Vorster C

机构信息

Schlichtungsstelle für Arzthaftpflichtfragen, norddeutschen Arztekammern, Hannover.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):586-9.

PMID:9064927
Abstract

The procedures of the arbitration committee of north Germany for medical liability claims are discussed. This procedure is set into relation to that at court. Due to the continuously maintained communication between lawyers and physicians, which does not occur in a comparable manner in court, the choice to proceed at a arbitration committee and an expert board is seen as more useful and pertinent than at court. This is specifically explained.

摘要

本文讨论了德国北部医疗责任索赔仲裁委员会的程序。该程序与法院程序进行了对比。由于律师和医生之间保持着持续的沟通,而这种沟通在法庭上不会以类似的方式出现,因此选择在仲裁委员会和专家委员会进行处理被认为比在法庭上更有用和更相关。对此进行了具体解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验