Vorster C
Schlichtungsstelle für Arzthaftpflichtfragen, norddeutschen Arztekammern, Hannover.
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):586-9.
The procedures of the arbitration committee of north Germany for medical liability claims are discussed. This procedure is set into relation to that at court. Due to the continuously maintained communication between lawyers and physicians, which does not occur in a comparable manner in court, the choice to proceed at a arbitration committee and an expert board is seen as more useful and pertinent than at court. This is specifically explained.
本文讨论了德国北部医疗责任索赔仲裁委员会的程序。该程序与法院程序进行了对比。由于律师和医生之间保持着持续的沟通,而这种沟通在法庭上不会以类似的方式出现,因此选择在仲裁委员会和专家委员会进行处理被认为比在法庭上更有用和更相关。对此进行了具体解释。