• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华盛顿州农村地区的孕产妇护理服务:对新生儿结局及资源利用的影响

Access to maternity care in rural Washington: its effect on neonatal outcomes and resource use.

作者信息

Nesbitt T S, Larson E H, Rosenblatt R A, Hart L G

机构信息

Department of Family Practice, University of California-Davis, Sacramento 95817, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1997 Jan;87(1):85-90. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.1.85.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.87.1.85
PMID:9065233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1380770/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to ascertain the effects of poor local access to obstetric care on the risks of having a neonate diagnosed as non-normal, a long hospital stay, and/or high hospital charges.

METHODS

Washington State birth certificates linked with hospital discharge abstracts of mothers and neonates were used to study 29809 births to residents of rural areas. Births to women from rural areas where more than two thirds of the women left for care were compared with births to women from rural areas where fewer than one third left for care.

RESULTS

Poor local access to providers of obstetric care was associated with a significantly greater risk of having a non-normal neonate for both Medicaid and privately insured patients. However, poor local access to care was consistently associated with higher charges and increased hospital length of stay only if the patient was privately insured.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that local maternity services may help prevent non-normal births to rural women and, among privately insured women, might decrease use of neonatal resources.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定当地产科护理服务可及性差对新生儿被诊断为异常、住院时间长和/或住院费用高的风险的影响。

方法

将华盛顿州出生证明与母亲和新生儿的医院出院摘要相链接,用于研究农村地区居民的29809例分娩。将三分之二以上妇女外出就医的农村地区妇女的分娩情况与三分之一以下妇女外出就医的农村地区妇女的分娩情况进行比较。

结果

对于医疗补助计划参保患者和私人保险患者而言,当地产科护理服务可及性差与新生儿异常风险显著增加相关。然而,只有当患者为私人保险时,当地护理服务可及性差才始终与更高的费用和更长的住院时间相关。

结论

这些结果表明,当地产科服务可能有助于预防农村妇女分娩异常,并且在私人保险妇女中,可能会减少新生儿资源的使用。

相似文献

1
Access to maternity care in rural Washington: its effect on neonatal outcomes and resource use.华盛顿州农村地区的孕产妇护理服务:对新生儿结局及资源利用的影响
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jan;87(1):85-90. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.1.85.
2
Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes.农村地区的产科护理可及性:对分娩结局的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1990 Jul;80(7):814-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.814.
3
Rural maternity care: new models of access.农村孕产妇保健:新的获取模式
Birth. 1996 Sep;23(3):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1996.tb00477.x.
4
Location of childbirth for rural women: implications for maternal levels of care.农村妇女的分娩地点:对孕产妇护理水平的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):661.e1-661.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.030. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Obstetric care and payment source: do low-risk Medicaid women get less care?产科护理与支付来源:低风险医疗补助计划女性获得的护理是否较少?
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):51-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.51.
6
Individual and community predictors of preterm birth and low birthweight along the rural-urban continuum in central Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州中部城乡连续区域早产和低出生体重的个体及社区预测因素
J Rural Health. 2007 Winter;23(1):42-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00066.x.
7
Delivery complications associated with prenatal care access for Medicaid-insured mothers in rural and urban hospitals.农村和城市医院中与医疗补助参保母亲产前护理相关的分娩并发症。
J Rural Health. 2005 Spring;21(2):158-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00076.x.
8
Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.不列颠哥伦比亚省农村和偏远地区的助产护理:一项对2003年至2008年有助产士参与护理的农村产妇围产期结局的回顾性队列研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12137.
9
The Practice of Midwifery in Rural US Hospitals.美国乡村医院的助产实践。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Jul;61(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12474. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
10
Obstetric health services in Far North Queensland: is choice an option?昆士兰远北地区的产科健康服务:选择权是否存在?
Aust J Public Health. 1995 Dec;19(6):580-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00462.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal Age and Inadequate Prenatal Care in West Virginia: A Project WATCH Study.西弗吉尼亚州的产妇年龄与产前护理不足:一项“关注项目”研究
J Appalach Health. 2024 Sep 1;6(1-2):21-37. doi: 10.13023/jah.0601.03. eCollection 2024.
2
Birth Outcomes Related to Distance in Rural and Frontier Kansas.堪萨斯州农村和边境地区与距离相关的出生结局
Kans J Med. 2022 Sep 21;15(3):319-324. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.17118. eCollection 2022.
3
Pregnancy, prenatal care, and delivery of mothers with disabilities in Korea.韩国残疾母亲的怀孕、产前护理及分娩情况。
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):127-32. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.2.127. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
4
An early stage evaluation of the Supporting Program for Obstetric Care Underserved Areas in Korea.韩国产科医疗服务欠缺地区支持项目的早期评估
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jun;29(6):764-70. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.6.764. Epub 2014 May 30.
5
Marathon maternity oral history project: Exploring rural birthing through narrative methods.马拉松产妇口述历史项目:通过叙事方法探索农村分娩情况。
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Jan;60(1):58-64.
6
The association between hospital obstetric volume and perinatal outcomes in California.加利福尼亚州医院产科容量与围产儿结局的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;207(6):478.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.029. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
7
Family physicians in the maternity care workforce: factors influencing declining trends.产妇保健劳动力中的家庭医生:影响下降趋势的因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Nov;17(9):1576-81. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1159-8.
8
Pregnancy and birth outcome improvements for American Indians in the Healthy Start project of the Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, 1998-2008.密歇根州部落间委员会健康开端项目中美国印第安人妊娠和生育结局的改善,1998-2008 年。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Aug;17(6):1005-15. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1075-y.
9
Birth outcomes across three rural-urban typologies in the Finger Lakes region of New York.纽约州五指湖地区三种城乡类型的生育结局。
J Rural Health. 2012 Spring;28(2):162-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00392.x. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
10
Family physicians who provide intrapartum care and those who do not: very different ways of viewing childbirth.提供分娩期照护的家庭医生和不提供的家庭医生:看待分娩的方式截然不同。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Apr;57(4):e139-47.

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.对凯斯纳产前护理充分性指数及一项提议的产前护理利用充分性指数的评估。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1414-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1414.
2
The perinatal and economic impact of prenatal care in a low-socioeconomic population.产前护理对低社会经济地位人群的围产期及经济影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jan;154(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90387-x.
3
Obstetric privileges for family physicians: a national study.家庭医生的产科诊疗特权:一项全国性研究。
J Fam Pract. 1989 Aug;29(2):179-84.
4
Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes.农村地区的产科护理可及性:对分娩结局的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1990 Jul;80(7):814-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.814.
5
The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn.产前护理对新生儿健康的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1979 Jul;69(7):653-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.7.653.