Dobie S, Hart L G, Fordyce M, Andrilla C H, Rosenblatt R A
WAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):51-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.51.
This study examined whether Medicaid-insured women at low risk receive less adequate obstetrical care than privately insured women.
Low-risk women who were cared for by a random sample of obstetrical providers in Washington State were randomly selected. Information on all prenatal and intrapartum services was abstracted from medical records. Service information was aggregated into standardized resource-use units. Results compared Medicaid-insured women with those who were privately insured.
Medicaid-insured women were significantly younger (22.5 years vs 26.9 years) and averaged 6% fewer visits than privately insured women. Nonetheless, Medicaid status had no meaningful association with prenatal, intrapartum, or overall resource use. Some variation occurred in individual resources received. Medicaid-insured women had 38.8% more resources expended on testing for sexually transmitted diseases. Privately insured women had more resources expended on alpha-fetoprotein testing and on amniocentesis. There were no meaningful differences in birthweight or gestational age at delivery.
In this study of women who entered obstetrical care at low risk, similar care and resources were expended on Medicaid-insured and on privately insured women.
本研究旨在探讨医疗补助保险的低风险女性所接受的产科护理是否不如私人保险女性充分。
从华盛顿州产科医疗服务提供者的随机样本中随机选取接受护理的低风险女性。从医疗记录中提取所有产前和产时服务的信息。服务信息汇总为标准化资源使用单位。将医疗补助保险的女性与私人保险的女性的结果进行比较。
医疗补助保险的女性明显更年轻(22.5岁对26.9岁),就诊次数比私人保险的女性平均少6%。尽管如此,医疗补助状态与产前、产时或总体资源使用没有显著关联。在接受的个别资源方面存在一些差异。医疗补助保险的女性在性传播疾病检测上花费的资源多38.8%。私人保险的女性在甲胎蛋白检测和羊膜穿刺术上花费的资源更多。出生体重或分娩时的孕周没有显著差异。
在这项针对低风险进入产科护理的女性的研究中,医疗补助保险的女性和私人保险的女性在护理和资源使用方面相似。