Doi M, Gajraj R J, Mantzaridis H, Kenny G N
Department of Anaesthesia, HCI International Medical Centre, Clydebank.
Br J Anaesth. 1997 Feb;78(2):180-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.2.180.
We studied four electrophysiological variables (bispectral index (BIS), 95% spectral edge frequency (SEF), median frequency (MF) and auditory evoked potential index (AEP index) in 10 patients during emergence from anaesthesia. We compared correlation of the signals with gradually decreasing calculated blood propofol concentrations, and evaluated the signal differences between preinduction and emergence from anaesthesia. Values of BIS, MF and SEF correlated with calculated blood concentrations of propofol during emergence from anaesthesia. The correlation was best with BIS, but was poor with MF and SEF at low calculated blood propofol concentrations. Although AEP index values did not correlate with calculated blood concentrations of propofol during emergence from anaesthesia, values after eye opening and before anaesthesia were well distinguished from those during emergence from anaesthesia. BIS correlated best with calculated blood concentrations of propofol. AEP index appeared to distinguish the awake from asleep state.
我们在10例患者麻醉苏醒期研究了四个电生理变量(脑电双频指数(BIS)、95%频谱边缘频率(SEF)、中位频率(MF)和听觉诱发电位指数(AEP指数))。我们比较了这些信号与逐渐降低的计算得出的血中丙泊酚浓度之间的相关性,并评估了诱导前和麻醉苏醒期之间的信号差异。在麻醉苏醒期,BIS、MF和SEF值与计算得出的血中丙泊酚浓度相关。与BIS的相关性最佳,但在计算得出的血中丙泊酚浓度较低时,与MF和SEF的相关性较差。虽然在麻醉苏醒期AEP指数值与计算得出的血中丙泊酚浓度不相关,但睁眼后和麻醉前的值与麻醉苏醒期的值有明显区别。BIS与计算得出的血中丙泊酚浓度相关性最佳。AEP指数似乎能区分清醒和睡眠状态。