Pashley D H, Matthews W G, Zhang Y, Johnson M
Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912, USA.
Arch Oral Biol. 1996 Nov;41(11):1065-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(96)00059-3.
Most authorities agree that the hydrodynamic theory of dentine sensitivity best explains the stimulus-response relations of most painful stimuli. However, as the usual hydrodynamic stimuli are so different, it has been impossible to compare them. The equivalency of hydrodynamic stimuli can be evaluated from measurements of the fluid movement induced in vitro and relating this to the hydraulic conductance (Lp) of the same dentine specimen. From this determination, a common denominator is obtained which is equivalent to the hydrostatic pressure that would be required to cause the same magnitude of fluid movement. The purpose of this study was to measure the direction and magnitude of fluid shifts across dentine in extracted human crown segments with a flat, dentine occlusal surface in response to the following hydrodynamic stimuli; air blast, 56 degrees C water, 2 degrees C water, tactile and osmotic. In acid-etched superficial dentine, which simulates hypersensitive dentine, the largest to the smallest fluid flows obtained were: hot > cold > air blast > osmotic > tactile. When these were converted to equivalency units, the ranking of stimuli from strongest to weakest was hot > cold > air blast > osmotic > tactile. This new approach to comparing hydrodynamic stimuli should be verified in vivo.
大多数权威人士都认为,牙本质敏感的流体动力学理论最能解释大多数疼痛刺激的刺激-反应关系。然而,由于常见的流体动力学刺激差异很大,因此无法对它们进行比较。可以通过测量体外诱导的流体运动并将其与同一牙本质标本的水力传导率(Lp)相关联来评估流体动力学刺激的等效性。通过这种测定,可获得一个共同的衡量标准,该标准等同于引起相同程度流体运动所需的静水压力。本研究的目的是测量在具有平坦牙本质咬合面的离体人牙冠段中,牙本质上流体转移的方向和幅度,以应对以下流体动力学刺激:喷气、56℃水、2℃水、触觉和渗透压刺激。在模拟过敏牙本质的酸蚀表层牙本质中,获得的流体流量从大到小依次为:热>冷>喷气>渗透压>触觉。当将这些转换为等效单位时,刺激从最强到最弱的排序为:热>冷>喷气>渗透压>触觉。这种比较流体动力学刺激的新方法应在体内进行验证。