Pelletier C A
New York State Veterans Home at Oxford, USA.
Dysphagia. 1997 Spring;12(2):74-8. doi: 10.1007/PL00009522.
This study presents the results of a blinded test of the performance of five commercial thickners. Experimental variables considered are brand of commercial thickener, type of liquid, desired thickness, and thickening time. Success of outcome is defined by a numerical rating scale comparing the consistency and taste to actual liquid samples. The findings suggest that no one commercial thickener consistently produces a desired consistency or was consistently superior regarding taste. Success in producing certain liquid consistencies and "good taste" varied according to brand, type of liquid, desired thickness, and thickening time used. It is suggested that specific recipes be developed for each brand and liquid to be thickened. Flavorings should be tested to enhance taste.
本研究展示了对五种商用增稠剂性能进行盲测的结果。所考虑的实验变量包括商用增稠剂的品牌、液体类型、期望的稠度以及增稠时间。结果的成功与否通过一个数字评分量表来定义,该量表将稠度和口感与实际液体样本进行比较。研究结果表明,没有一种商用增稠剂能始终如一地产生期望的稠度,或者在口感方面始终表现更优。在产生特定液体稠度和“良好口感”方面的成功因品牌、液体类型、期望的稠度以及所使用的增稠时间而异。建议针对每个品牌和要增稠的液体制定具体配方。应测试调味剂以提升口感。