Suppr超能文献

五种市售增稠剂的稠度和口感比较。

A comparison of consistency and taste of five commercial thickeners.

作者信息

Pelletier C A

机构信息

New York State Veterans Home at Oxford, USA.

出版信息

Dysphagia. 1997 Spring;12(2):74-8. doi: 10.1007/PL00009522.

Abstract

This study presents the results of a blinded test of the performance of five commercial thickners. Experimental variables considered are brand of commercial thickener, type of liquid, desired thickness, and thickening time. Success of outcome is defined by a numerical rating scale comparing the consistency and taste to actual liquid samples. The findings suggest that no one commercial thickener consistently produces a desired consistency or was consistently superior regarding taste. Success in producing certain liquid consistencies and "good taste" varied according to brand, type of liquid, desired thickness, and thickening time used. It is suggested that specific recipes be developed for each brand and liquid to be thickened. Flavorings should be tested to enhance taste.

摘要

本研究展示了对五种商用增稠剂性能进行盲测的结果。所考虑的实验变量包括商用增稠剂的品牌、液体类型、期望的稠度以及增稠时间。结果的成功与否通过一个数字评分量表来定义,该量表将稠度和口感与实际液体样本进行比较。研究结果表明,没有一种商用增稠剂能始终如一地产生期望的稠度,或者在口感方面始终表现更优。在产生特定液体稠度和“良好口感”方面的成功因品牌、液体类型、期望的稠度以及所使用的增稠时间而异。建议针对每个品牌和要增稠的液体制定具体配方。应测试调味剂以提升口感。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验