• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patient Selection for Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Private Hospital Setting.

作者信息

Bernstein P, Walla K, Platt LD

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Infertility, 8737 Beverly Blvd., Suite 201, Los Angeles, CA 90048.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Aug;1(4, Part 2):S3.

PMID:9073653
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the patient selection patterns of physicians in private practice performing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). Forty-nine laparoscopic hysterectomies were compared to 30 vaginal hysterectomies (VH) performed during the same time period. There was no statistical difference with respect to patient age, gravity, and parity. There were no major complications in either group and no difference in minor complications. Significantly larger percentages of LAVH patients were operated on for fibroids, endometriosis, and pelvic pain. Fifty-one percent of LAVH patients but only 23% of VH patients underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Blood loss was greater in the LAVH group. The mean operating time was 95±36 minutes for VH vs. 164±48 minutes for LAVH. The mean uterine weights were not statistically different, 149±66 g for VH and 161±92 g for LAVH. We conclude that patients undergoing LAVH in a private hospital setting are a different population than those undergoing VH and that those differences are reflected both in the indications for surgery and in the performance of oophorectomy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patient Selection for Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Private Hospital Setting.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Aug;1(4, Part 2):S3.
2
A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.前瞻性随机比较经阴道子宫切除术、腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术和全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性子宫疾病的女性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Feb;148(2):172-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.019. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
3
Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study.经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫增大,有无腹腔镜辅助:随机研究
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 1):712-6.
4
Continuing Experience with Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Private Teaching Community Hospital.在一家私立教学社区医院进行腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的持续经验
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Aug;1(4, Part 2):S3.
5
Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study.有症状的子宫平滑肌瘤女性行阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的回顾性研究
Prz Menopauzalny. 2014 Sep;13(4):242-6. doi: 10.5114/pm.2014.45000. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
6
Experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.腹腔镜辅助下经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫增大的经验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Sep;280(3):425-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-0944-0. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
7
A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 May;90(5):837-43.
8
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. A suitable substitute for abdominal hysterectomy?腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术。它是腹式子宫切除术的合适替代方法吗?
J Reprod Med. 2000 Sep;45(9):738-42.
9
[Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].[4180例子宫切除术的手术方式、适应证及医学经济学评价]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2003 Aug;25(4):406-9.
10
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysterectomy: meta analysis.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术的比较:荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.005.