• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康青年和老年人中的语义饱和现象。

Semantic satiation in healthy young and older adults.

作者信息

Balota D A, Black S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1997 Mar;25(2):190-202. doi: 10.3758/bf03201112.

DOI:10.3758/bf03201112
PMID:9099071
Abstract

In four experiments, semantic satiation was investigated in young and old adults. In the first two experiments, subjects were repeatedly presented a word (e.g., DOG) and then were presented a pair of words (e.g., DOG-CAT or DOG-CHAIR) for a relatedness decision. The results of both experiments indicated that for the young adults, the relatedness effect (the difference between response latency on related and unrelated trials) decreased as a function of the number of times the satiated word was repeated, whereas for the older adults, there was no evidence of a decrease in the relatedness effect across repetitions of the satiated word. In the third experiment, we investigated whether phonological codes are also susceptible to satiation. This experiment was similar to the first two experiments with the exception that subjects made rhyme decisions (SAME-CLAIM VS. SAME-DIME) instead of semantic relatedness decisions. The results of this experiment did not yield any evidence of satiation for either the young adults or the older adults. The final experiment eliminated a simple decrease in attentional alertness or fatigue account of the semantic satiation effects found in the first two experiments. In this experiment, the repeated word was always unrelated to the pair of words presented for the relatedness decision. The results of this experiment did not yield any evidence of semantic satiation for either the young or the older adults. The discussion focuses on the mechanisms underlying semantic satiation and the implications of age-related changes in these mechanisms.

摘要

在四项实验中,对年轻人和老年人的语义饱和现象进行了研究。在前两项实验中,向受试者反复呈现一个单词(如“DOG”),然后呈现一对单词(如“DOG - CAT”或“DOG - CHAIR”)以供其做出关联性判断。两项实验的结果均表明,对于年轻人而言,关联性效应(相关试验与不相关试验的反应潜伏期之差)随着饱和单词重复次数的增加而降低,而对于老年人来说,没有证据表明饱和单词重复呈现时关联性效应会降低。在第三个实验中,我们研究了语音代码是否也容易出现饱和现象。该实验与前两个实验类似,不同之处在于受试者要做出押韵判断(“SAME - CLAIM”与“SAME - DIME”)而非语义关联性判断。该实验结果没有为年轻人或老年人产生任何饱和现象的证据。最后一个实验排除了前两个实验中发现的语义饱和效应是由注意力警觉性简单下降或疲劳导致的可能性。在这个实验中,重复呈现的单词总是与供关联性判断的那对单词无关。该实验结果没有为年轻人或老年人产生任何语义饱和现象的证据。讨论聚焦于语义饱和背后的机制以及这些机制中与年龄相关的变化所带来的影响。

相似文献

1
Semantic satiation in healthy young and older adults.健康青年和老年人中的语义饱和现象。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Mar;25(2):190-202. doi: 10.3758/bf03201112.
2
Semantic satiation effect in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人的语义饱和效应。
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Jun;98(3 Pt 1):999-1016. doi: 10.2466/pms.98.3.999-1016.
3
Semantic satiation and lexical ambiguity resolution.
Am J Psychol. 2001 Winter;114(4):493-510.
4
Adult Age Differences in Sensitivity to Semantic Satiation.成年人对语义饱和敏感度的年龄差异。
Exp Aging Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):152-172. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2048585. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
5
The effect of presemantic acoustic adaptation on semantic "satiation".语义前声学适应对语义“饱和”的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1997 May;25(3):305-12. doi: 10.3758/bf03211286.
6
On the locus of the semantic satiation effect: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Dec;28(8):1366-77. doi: 10.3758/bf03211837.
7
[The effect of semantic satiation on a double lexical decision task].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2003 Apr;74(1):45-50. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.74.45.
8
Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task.阅读中语音信息的自动激活:来自语义相关性判断任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):833-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03211402.
9
Effects of homograph meaning frequency on semantic satiation.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Sep;67(3):175-87. doi: 10.1037/a0033838.
10
[An influence of flanker in a category verification task on semantic satiation effect].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2005 Oct;76(4):336-43. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.76.336.

引用本文的文献

1
The neurocognitive basis of Chinese idiomatic constructions and processing differences between native speakers and L2 learners of Mandarin.汉语习语结构的神经认知基础以及汉语母语者与汉语第二语言学习者之间的加工差异。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1112611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112611. eCollection 2023.
2
Social affiliation is sufficient to provoke the partner-advantage.社会关系足以引发伴侣优势。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25052-1.
3
Positive Valence Bias in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: Evidence From Chinese Emotion Idioms.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic satiation affects category membership decision time but not lexical priming.
Mem Cognit. 1984 Sep;12(5):483-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03198310.
2
Disruption and habituation of stable fixed-interval behavior in younger and older monkeys.
Physiol Behav. 1984 Mar;32(3):341-4. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90245-2.
3
Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.词汇判断是衡量词汇通达的好方法吗?词频在被忽视的判断阶段中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):340-57. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.340.
4
二语词汇习得中的正价偏差:来自汉语情感习语的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;13:783604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783604. eCollection 2022.
4
Dynamic interactive theory as a domain-general account of social perception.动态交互理论作为社会认知的一种通用领域解释。
Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2020;61:237-287. doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Electrocortical N400 Effects of Semantic Satiation.语义饱和的皮层电活动N400效应
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 5;8:2117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02117. eCollection 2017.
6
Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.食物相关词汇会分散饥饿者的注意力:无关但与生物相关的意外听觉词汇的非自愿语义加工证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):e0190644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190644. eCollection 2018.
7
Mind wandering minimizes mind numbing: Reducing semantic-satiation effects through absorptive lapses of attention.思绪游荡可最大程度减少思维麻木:通过注意力的吸收性疏忽来减轻语义饱和效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1273-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0993-2.
8
Exploring the repetition paradox: the effects of learning context and massed repetition on memory.探索重复悖论:学习情境和集中重复对记忆的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):1026-32. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0566-1.
9
The frames of reference of the motor-visual aftereffect.运动视觉后效的参照系。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040892. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
10
Emotion words shape emotion percepts.情绪词汇塑造情绪感知。
Emotion. 2012 Apr;12(2):314-25. doi: 10.1037/a0026007. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.“ROWS” 就是 “ROSE”:拼写、发音和阅读。
Mem Cognit. 1987 May;15(3):181-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03197716.
5
Age-related differences in lexical access, spreading activation, and simple pronunciation.词汇通达、扩散激活和简单发音方面的年龄相关差异。
Psychol Aging. 1988 Mar;3(1):84-93. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.3.1.84.
6
Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system.人类信息处理系统中记忆存储、选择性注意及其相互制约的不断演变的概念。
Psychol Bull. 1988 Sep;104(2):163-91. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163.
7
The information-loss model: a mathematical theory of age-related cognitive slowing.
Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):475-87. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.475.
8
Automatic and attentional priming in young and older adults: reevaluation of the two-process model.年轻人和老年人中的自动启动和注意启动:双过程模型的重新评估
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 May;18(2):485-502. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.485.
9
Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: a psychophysiological approach.
Psychol Aging. 1992 Mar;7(1):65-71. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.1.65.