Suppr超能文献

老年患者髋或膝关节置换术中异丙酚患者自控镇静

Propofol patient-controlled sedation during hip or knee arthroplasty in elderly patients.

作者信息

Ganapathy S, Herrick I A, Gelb A W, Kirkby J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Western Ontario, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;44(4):385-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03014458.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Little information is available regarding the use of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) among the elderly. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of propofol PCS among elderly patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Forty patients, aged 65-78 yr, undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia were randomized to receive propofol PCS (dose = 0.3 mg.kg-1, delay = three min; n = 20) or anaesthetist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation (n = 20). Sedation, anxiety and discomfort visual analogue scores (VAS) were measured, by an independent observer, preoperatively, immediately at the end of surgery and one hour following admission to the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU). Cognition was evaluated, using an abbreviated Mini Mental Status Examination, preoperatively and in the PACU. Patient satisfaction, based on VAS and a brief questionnaire, was measured in the PACU. The incidence of intraoperative complications was also compared.

RESULTS

Patient satisfaction was high in each group. Sedation and anxiety VAS were similar in each group. A high incidence of pain with drug injection was noted among patients receiving propofol (80%). Transient deeper levels of sedation (6 vs 1; P = 0.05) were observed more commonly in the propofol PCS group.

CONCLUSION

Propofol PCS provides effective sedation. Using a propofol dose of 0.3 mg.kg-1, transient episodes of deeper sedation were noted more frequently among patients receiving PCS. These episodes did not require intervention but, suggest that this propofol PCS dose approaches the limit of safety and should be further reduced for some elderly patients.

摘要

目的

关于老年患者使用患者自控镇静(PCS)的信息较少。本研究评估了丙泊酚PCS在接受髋或膝关节置换术的老年患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

40例年龄在65 - 78岁、在区域麻醉下接受髋或膝关节置换术的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受丙泊酚PCS(剂量 = 0.3 mg·kg-1,延迟时间 = 3分钟;n = 20)或麻醉医生给予的咪达唑仑 - 芬太尼镇静(n = 20)。由一名独立观察者在术前、手术结束时即刻以及进入麻醉后护理单元(PACU)1小时后测量镇静、焦虑和不适视觉模拟评分(VAS)。术前和在PACU中使用简易精神状态检查表评估认知功能。在PACU中根据VAS和一份简短问卷测量患者满意度。还比较了术中并发症的发生率。

结果

每组患者的满意度都很高。每组的镇静和焦虑VAS相似。接受丙泊酚的患者中药物注射时疼痛发生率较高(80%)。丙泊酚PCS组更常见短暂的较深程度镇静(6例对1例;P = 0.05)。

结论

丙泊酚PCS提供有效的镇静。使用0.3 mg·kg-1的丙泊酚剂量时,接受PCS的患者中更频繁地出现短暂的较深程度镇静发作。这些发作无需干预,但表明该丙泊酚PCS剂量接近安全极限,对于一些老年患者应进一步降低剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验