Suppr超能文献

对A型和B型评分者进行最大运动测试期间的鼓励。

Encouragement during maximal exercise testing of type A and type B scorers.

作者信息

Chitwood L F, Moffatt R J, Burke K, Luchino P, Jordan J C

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, and Leisure Management, University of Mississippi 38677, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Apr;84(2):507-12. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.2.507.

Abstract

The influence of verbal encouragement during assessment of maximal oxygen consumption of subjects scoring as Type A and Type B on the Jenkins Activity Survey, Form T was examined. Fourteen Type A and 12 Type B scorers performed two randomly assigned tests on a motor-driven treadmill with and without verbal encouragement during testing. Treadmill time, oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate, and respiratory exchange ratio at exhaustion were examined. Verbal encouragement led to significantly greater treadmill time, VO2, and respiratory exchange ratio for Type B scorers when compared with the non-encouragement trial. Treadmill time, VO2, heart rate, and respiratory exchange ratio at exhaustion were not different between treatments for the Type A scorers. Type A scorers ran significantly longer without encouragement than Type B scorers; however, when encouragement was provided, treadmill time for Type A and Type B scorers did not differ significantly. The results suggest that attainment of maximal effort is not dependent on verbal encouragement for Type A scorers, whereas verbal encouragement is necessary to assure attainment of maximal physiologic effort for those individuals scoring as Type B.

摘要

本研究考察了在对詹金斯活动调查表T型中A型和B型得分受试者进行最大摄氧量评估期间言语鼓励的影响。14名A型得分者和12名B型得分者在电动跑步机上进行了两项随机分配的测试,测试期间有或没有言语鼓励。对力竭时的跑步机运动时间、耗氧量(VO2)、心率和呼吸交换率进行了检测。与无鼓励试验相比,言语鼓励使B型得分者的跑步机运动时间、VO2和呼吸交换率显著增加。对于A型得分者,不同处理之间力竭时的跑步机运动时间、VO2、心率和呼吸交换率没有差异。A型得分者在无鼓励时的跑步时间显著长于B型得分者;然而,当给予鼓励时,A型和B型得分者的跑步机运动时间没有显著差异。结果表明,对于A型得分者,达到最大努力并不依赖于言语鼓励,而对于那些B型得分者,言语鼓励对于确保达到最大生理努力是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验