MacGregor R R, Graziani A L
Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):457-67. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.457.
Much early experience with antibiotic therapy involved oral administration of sulfonamides, penicillins, tetracyclines, and chloramphenicol. Newer acid-labile, less-soluble agents created the need for intravenous (i.v.) administration, and i.v. technology (hyporeactive catheter polymers, infusion pumps, etc.) improved to where i.v. administration became normative for the treatment of serious infections. Recently, this preference is being reconsidered in light of agents that are highly effective orally, growing appreciation that i.v. treatment has serious complications, and economic pressures to provide the best care at the lowest cost. This article presents a brief history of administration routes and reviews the rationale for considering oral treatment for serious infections, including consideration of pharmacokinetics and minimum inhibitory concentrations. Published reports supporting the efficacy of orally administered antibiotics either as sole treatment or following an initial parenteral course are reviewed in detail, and examples of programs that educate physicians about the rationale, acceptibility, and benefits of oral administration are given.
早期抗生素治疗的很多经验都涉及口服磺胺类药物、青霉素、四环素和氯霉素。新型酸不稳定、溶解性较差的药物使得静脉注射给药成为必要,并且静脉注射技术(低反应性导管聚合物、输液泵等)得到改进,以至于静脉注射给药成为治疗严重感染的规范方法。近来,鉴于一些药物口服高效、人们越来越认识到静脉注射治疗有严重并发症以及存在以最低成本提供最佳治疗的经济压力,这种偏好正在被重新审视。本文介绍了给药途径的简要历史,并综述了考虑对严重感染进行口服治疗的基本原理,包括对药代动力学和最低抑菌浓度的考虑。详细回顾了支持口服抗生素作为单一治疗或在初始肠外治疗疗程后使用的有效性的已发表报告,并给出了一些向医生传授口服给药的基本原理、可接受性和益处的项目实例。