• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

防止牙本质/修复体界面微渗漏所需的剪切粘结强度。

Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the dentin/restoration interface.

作者信息

Retief D H, Mandras R S, Russell C M

机构信息

Department of Biomaterials, University of Alabama School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 1994 Feb;7(1):44-6.

PMID:9115679
Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the relationship between the shear bond strength [SBS] of seven dentin bonding systems to dentin and the quantitative microleakage [ML] of Class V preparations in dentin restored with these systems. The systems evaluated were All-Bond/Bisfil-P [A]; Syntac/Heliomolar [B]; XR-Bond/Herculite [C]; Scotchbond 2/Silux [D]; Denthesive/Charisma [E]; Prisma Universal Bond 2/Prisma AP.H [F]; and Tenure/Perfection [G]. The 115 specimens were removed from the assembly apparatus and stored in saline at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, the SBS determined and expressed in MPa. Fifteen Class V preparations in dentin were restored with each of the bonding systems, thermocycled 500x in 2% methylene blue solution between 50 degrees C and 8 degrees C, and the ML determined by means of a spectrophotometric dye-recovery method. The ML was expressed in microgram dye/restoration. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls test, and linear regression analysis. The SBS in MPa were: A:17.2 +/- 3.6; B:15.9 +/- 2.1; C:15.4 +/- 3.7; D:11.6 +/- 2.2; E:10.7 +/- 3.7; F:10.4 +/- 2.5; G:8.2 +/- 3.9. The ML in microgram dye/restoration were: A:2.6 +/- 1.2; B:2.6 +/- 1.0; C:2.2 +/- 1.9; D:3.1 +/- 2.9; E:4.6 +/- 4.2; F:2.6 +/- 2.5; G:4.4 +/- 4.1. SBS = 20.91-2.60 [microgram dye]. The results suggest that a SBS of +/- 21 MPa may reduce ML to near zero.

摘要

本体外研究的目的是确定七种牙本质粘结系统与牙本质之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)以及用这些系统修复的牙本质Ⅴ类洞型的定量微渗漏(ML)之间的关系。所评估的系统包括全粘结/双氟-P(A); Syntac/光固化玻璃离子(B); XR粘结剂/超硬复合树脂(C); 3M Scotchbond 2/3M Silux(D); Denthesive/卡瑞斯玛(E); 普瑞玛通用粘结剂2/普瑞玛AP.H(F);以及Tenure/Perfection(G)。115个标本从组装装置中取出,在37℃的盐水中储存24小时,测定SBS并以MPa表示。用每种粘结系统修复15个牙本质Ⅴ类洞型,在50℃和8℃之间的2%亚甲蓝溶液中进行500次热循环,然后用分光光度法染料回收法测定ML。ML以微克染料/修复体表示。数据采用方差分析、学生-纽曼-柯尔斯检验和线性回归分析。以MPa为单位的SBS分别为:A:17.2±3.6;B:15.9±2.1;C:15.4±3.7;D:11.6±2.2;E:10.7±3.7;F:10.4±2.5;G:8.2±3.9。以微克染料/修复体为单位的ML分别为:A:2.6±1.2;B:2.6±1.0;C:2.2±1.9;D:3.1±2.9;E:4.6±4.2;F:2.6±2.5;G:4.4±4.1。SBS = 20.91 - 2.60[微克染料]。结果表明,±21MPa的SBS可能会将ML降低至接近零。

相似文献

1
Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the dentin/restoration interface.防止牙本质/修复体界面微渗漏所需的剪切粘结强度。
Am J Dent. 1994 Feb;7(1):44-6.
2
Laboratory evaluation of the XR-Bond Dentin/Enamel Bonding System.XR-粘结剂牙本质/牙釉质粘结系统的实验室评估
J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1994 Jul;49(7):331-7.
3
Evaluation of the Syntac bonding system.
Am J Dent. 1993 Feb;6(1):17-21.
4
Laboratory evaluation of the Gluma 3-step bonding system.Gluma三步粘结系统的实验室评估。
Am J Dent. 1995 Apr;8(2):93-8.
5
Shear bond strength and microleakage of All-Bond.
Am J Dent. 1993 Jun;6(3):148-54.
6
Laboratory evaluation of the A.R.T. bonding system.
Am J Dent. 1994 Aug;7(4):195-9.
7
Quantitative microleakage of six dentin bonding systems.
Am J Dent. 1993 Jun;6(3):119-22.
8
Quality assessment of marginal sealing using 7 dentin adhesive systems.
Quintessence Int. 2000 Jun;31(6):423-9.
9
The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.单步粘结系统的不同干燥方法对牙齿颜色修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003 Feb 15;4(1):1-9.
10
Phosphoric acid as a dentin etchant.
Am J Dent. 1992 Feb;5(1):24-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative in vitro evaluation of internal adaptation of resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite and bonding agent applied as a liner under composite restoration: A scanning electron microscope study.复合树脂修复体下用作衬层的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、流动复合树脂和粘结剂内部适应性的体外比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Apr;7(4):27-31.
2
Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: in vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques.[牙合]面下边缘的 II 类复合树脂修复体的微渗漏:不同修复技术的体外评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Sep 1;18(5):e793-8. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18344.
3
A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.
空气喷砂预处理窝洞后复合树脂修复体相关牙本质过敏及微渗漏的比较评估——一项体外研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jul;3(3):306-13. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.103624.
4
Er,Cr:YSGG laser influence on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations.铒铬:YSGG 激光对 V 类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(5):1257-62. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1200-6. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations.黏结修复体的耐久性和临床成功率。
Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):72-86. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011.
6
Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.聚硅氧烷烷类和甲基丙烯酸酯类嵌体修复体的微渗漏。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0619-7. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
7
Influence of the methodology and evaluation criteria on determining microleakage in dentin-restorative interfaces.
Clin Oral Investig. 2006 Dec;10(4):317-23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0061-4. Epub 2006 Aug 3.