Roderick P, Ruddock V, Hunt P, Miller G
MRC Epidemiology and Medical Care Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jan;47(414):7-12.
Dietary factors are an important contribution to the high rates of coronary heart disease in the UK. One approach to achieving change is health-promoting advice in primary care.
To compare the effectiveness of structured dietary advice by practice nurses with standard health education in changing serum cholesterol, weight and diet.
Randomized, controlled trial within eight general practices in England and Wales allocated within matched geographical pairs to 'dietary advice' or 'usual care'. Men and women aged 35-59 years, recruited opportunistically by their GPs, underwent health checks. In 'dietary advice' practices, subjects received dietary advice from specially trained nurses based on negotiated change principles, reinforced at follow up. In 'usual care' practices, subjects were only given standard health education materials.
A total of 956 patients were recruited: 473 in 'dietary advice' practices and 483 in 'usual care' practices. Compliance with annual follow up was 80%. Compared with 'usual care' practices, there was a mean 0.20 mmol/l lower serum cholesterol (95% CI -0.38 to -0.03 at 1 year) in 'dietary advice' practices. There was a small fall in weight of 0.56 kg (95% CI -1.04 to -0.07) and reductions in total and saturated fat. Factor VII coagulant activity fell by a mean of 6.7% of the standard (95% CI -15.4 to +2.0).
Provision of standard health education material alone as part of a health check had no effect on coronary heart disease risk factors. There were modest changes in diet and associated risk factors when a more intensive and individual approach to dietary advice was given by practice nurses. This is, however, probably an ineffective use of resources, except in those at high risk of coronary heart disease. Whole-population strategies to achieve dietary change are required.
饮食因素是导致英国冠心病高发的重要原因之一。在初级医疗保健中提供促进健康的建议是实现改变的一种方法。
比较执业护士提供的结构化饮食建议与标准健康教育在改变血清胆固醇、体重和饮食方面的效果。
在英格兰和威尔士的8家普通诊所进行随机对照试验,按地理区域配对分为“饮食建议组”或“常规护理组”。年龄在35 - 59岁的男性和女性由其全科医生随机招募,接受健康检查。在“饮食建议组”诊所,受试者从经过专门培训的护士那里获得基于协商改变原则的饮食建议,并在随访时得到强化。在“常规护理组”诊所,受试者仅获得标准的健康教育材料。
共招募了956名患者:“饮食建议组”473名,“常规护理组”483名。年度随访的依从率为80%。与“常规护理组”相比,“饮食建议组”血清胆固醇平均降低0.20 mmol/l(1年时95%可信区间为 -0.38至 -0.03)。体重略有下降,为0.56 kg(95%可信区间为 -1.04至 -0.07),总脂肪和饱和脂肪摄入量减少。凝血因子VII促凝活性平均下降了标准值的6.7%(95%可信区间为 -15.4至 +2.0)。
作为健康检查一部分仅提供标准健康教育材料对冠心病危险因素没有影响。当执业护士采用更强化和个性化的饮食建议方法时,饮食及相关危险因素有适度变化。然而,这可能是对资源的无效利用,除了那些冠心病高危人群。需要采取针对全体人群的策略来实现饮食改变。