Heffner J E, Fahy B, Hilling L, Barbieri C
Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85001, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;155(3):1055-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.3.9116986.
We performed a two-site prospective, controlled interventional study of patients enrolled in pulmonary rehabilitation to assess effects of advance directive education on completion of (1) living wills, (2) durable powers of attorney for health care (DPAHC), (3) patient-physician discussions about advance directives, and (4) discussions about life support, in addition to (5) patient impressions that their physicians understood their end-of-life preferences. The educational group had an increase (p < 0.05) in all five study outcomes compared with baseline values; the control group had an increase in three of five outcomes. The effect strength was greater in the educational compared with the control group for completion of DPAHC (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 12.9), advance directive discussions (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 8.3), initiation of life-support discussions (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 7.7), and development of patient assurance that their physicians understand their preferences (OR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 13.4). The educational intervention was an independent explanatory factor by multivariate analysis. We conclude that patients enrolled in pulmonary rehabilitation are receptive to advance care planning, which is promoted by education on end-of-life issues.
我们对参加肺康复治疗的患者进行了一项双中心前瞻性对照干预研究,以评估预先医疗指示教育对以下方面的影响:(1)生前遗嘱的完成情况;(2)医疗保健的持久授权书(DPAHC);(3)患者与医生关于预先医疗指示的讨论;(4)关于生命支持的讨论;此外还包括(5)患者对其医生理解其临终偏好的印象。与基线值相比,教育组在所有五项研究结果中均有所增加(p < 0.05);对照组在五项结果中的三项有所增加。在完成DPAHC(优势比[OR] = 3.6,95%置信区间[CI] 1.1至12.9)、预先医疗指示讨论(OR = 2.9,95% CI 1.1至8.3)、启动生命支持讨论(OR = 2.7,95% CI 1.0至7.7)以及患者确信其医生理解其偏好(OR = 3.7,95% CI 1.3至13.4)方面,教育组与对照组相比效果强度更大。多因素分析显示,教育干预是一个独立的解释因素。我们得出结论,参加肺康复治疗的患者易于接受预先护理计划,而关于临终问题的教育可促进这一计划的实施。