• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估卫生技术评估的影响。

Assessing the impact of health technology assessment.

作者信息

Jacob R, McGregor M

机构信息

Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997 Winter;13(1):68-80. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300010242.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462300010242
PMID:9119625
Abstract

Methodology for evaluation of impact of health technology assessments (HTAs) is outlined and its use illustrated by applying it to 21 HTAs produced by CETS. Impact on policies and technology diffusion was identified in documents, through interviews, questionnaires, and use of data banks. There was evidence that all but three reports influenced policy and that cost-minimization studies caused savings of between $16 million and $27 million annually. Precise estimates of impact will seldom be possible, but systematic documentation of effects is feasible.

摘要

概述了评估卫生技术评估(HTA)影响的方法,并通过将其应用于CETS编制的21项HTA来说明其用途。通过文件、访谈、问卷调查和使用数据库确定了对政策和技术传播的影响。有证据表明,除三份报告外,所有报告都对政策产生了影响,成本最小化研究每年节省了1600万美元至2700万美元。很少能够精确估计影响,但系统记录影响是可行的。

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of health technology assessment.评估卫生技术评估的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997 Winter;13(1):68-80. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300010242.
2
Medical innovation duels cost containment.医学创新与成本控制相互较量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):7-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.7.
3
[The Danish Health Technology Assessment model. A systematic review of Danish HTAs published by CEMTV from 1998 to 2004].[丹麦卫生技术评估模型。对CEMTV在1998年至2004年发表的丹麦卫生技术评估进行的系统综述]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 May 22;168(21):2074-8.
4
The dynamics of technological change in medicine.医学领域技术变革的动态
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):28-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.28.
5
Healthcare costs for new technologies.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Mar;36 Suppl 1:S139-43. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0975-y.
6
End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact.终端用户参与卫生技术评估(HTA)的制定:提高影响力的一种方式。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Spring;21(2):263-7.
7
When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: a comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies.何时以及如何评估快速变化的技术:四种通用技术在医学应用方面的比较研究
Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(14):i-vi, 1-149.
8
Health care technology assessment--the South African health care system in transition.
S Afr Med J. 1999 Feb;89(2):149-55.
9
Cost escalation in health-care technology--possible solutions.
S Afr Med J. 1993 Jun;83(6):420-2.
10
Innovation under federal health care reform.联邦医疗保健改革下的创新。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):82-97. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.82.

引用本文的文献

1
How Least Developed to Lower-Middle Income Countries Use Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review.最不发达国家和中下等收入国家如何使用卫生技术评估:范围综述。
Pathog Glob Health. 2023 Mar;117(2):104-119. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2022.2106108. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
Assessing the performance of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies: developing a multi-country, multi-stakeholder, and multi-dimensional framework to explore mechanisms of impact.评估卫生技术评估(HTA)机构的绩效:构建一个多国、多利益相关方和多维度的框架以探索影响机制。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 2;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00290-8.
3
The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis.
临床试验中患者报告结局(PRO)数据的影响:系统评价和批判性分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Oct 16;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1220-z.
4
Assessing the impact of healthcare research: A systematic review of methodological frameworks.评估医疗保健研究的影响:方法框架的系统评价
PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 9;14(8):e1002370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002370. eCollection 2017 Aug.
5
The impact on healthcare, policy and practice from 36 multi-project research programmes: findings from two reviews.36个多项目研究计划对医疗保健、政策及实践的影响:两项综述的结果
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 28;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0191-y.
6
Measuring research impact in Australia's medical research institutes: a scoping literature review of the objectives for and an assessment of the capabilities of research impact assessment frameworks.衡量澳大利亚医学研究机构的研究影响力:对研究影响力评估框架目标的范围界定文献综述及能力评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 21;15(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0180-1.
7
Returns on Research Funded Under the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme: Economic Analysis and Case Studies.英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估(HTA)计划资助研究的回报:经济分析与案例研究
Rand Health Q. 2016 May 9;5(4):5.
8
Measuring Use of Research Evidence: The Structured Interview for Evidence Use.衡量研究证据的使用情况:证据使用结构化访谈
Res Soc Work Pract. 2016 Sep;26(5):550-564. doi: 10.1177/1049731514560413. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
9
Emerging Therapeutic Enhancement Enabling Health Technologies and Their Discourses: What Is Discussed within the Health Domain?新兴治疗增强型健康技术及其相关论述:健康领域内的讨论内容是什么?
Healthcare (Basel). 2013 Jul 25;1(1):20-52. doi: 10.3390/healthcare1010020.
10
Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review.基于本地/医院的卫生技术评估(HTA)的效果与影响:一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;3:129. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-129.