Beekman A T, Deeg D J, Van Limbeek J, Braam A W, De Vries M Z, Van Tilburg W
Department of Psychiatry, Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):231-5. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796003510.
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) has been widely used in studies of late-life depression. Psychometric properties are generally favourable, but data on the criterion validity of the CES-D in elderly community-based samples are lacking. In a sample of older (55-85 years) inhabitants of the Netherlands, 487 subjects were selected to study criterion validity of the CES-D. Using the 1-month prevalence of major depression derived from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) as criterion, the weighted sensitivity of the CES-D was 100%; specificity 88%; and positive predictive value 13.2%. False positives were not more likely among elderly with physical illness, cognitive decline or anxiety. We conclude that the criterion validity of the CES-D for major depression was very satisfactory in this sample of older adults.
流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)已广泛应用于老年期抑郁症的研究。其心理测量特性总体良好,但缺乏基于社区的老年样本中CES-D效标效度的数据。在荷兰年龄较大(55 - 85岁)的居民样本中,选取了487名受试者来研究CES-D的效标效度。以诊断访谈表(DIS)得出的重度抑郁症1个月患病率作为标准,CES-D的加权敏感度为100%;特异度为88%;阳性预测值为13.2%。在患有躯体疾病、认知功能减退或焦虑症的老年人中,假阳性的可能性并没有更高。我们得出结论,在这个老年成年人样本中,CES-D对重度抑郁症的效标效度非常令人满意。