Schein R L, Koenig H G
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;12(4):436-46.
This study examines the use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) in a sample of elderly, medically ill inpatients. Seventy-six individuals completed the CES-D and a psychiatric interview, from which DSM-III-R diagnoses of depression were obtained. Analyses of sensitivity and specificity indicated that use of an alternative scoring method which more closely approximates current diagnostic criteria for depression may improve the predictive power of the test. Employment of stringent cut-scores was not supported, as sensitivity was compromised. Item analyses demonstrated that seven of the CES-D items failed to discriminate major, minor and nondepressed patients, and that several of these items tapped somatic symptoms. These findings suggest that the validity of the CES-D may be compromised when used with elderly medical patients. and modifications for its use are recommended.
本研究调查了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)在老年内科住院患者样本中的使用情况。76名个体完成了CES-D量表测试及一次精神科访谈,据此得出了基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)的抑郁症诊断结果。敏感性和特异性分析表明,采用一种更接近当前抑郁症诊断标准的替代计分方法可能会提高该测试的预测能力。由于敏感性受到影响,不支持采用严格的划界分数。项目分析表明,CES-D量表中的7个项目未能区分重度、轻度和非抑郁患者,且其中几个项目涉及躯体症状。这些发现表明,CES-D量表用于老年内科患者时,其效度可能会受到影响,建议对其使用进行修改。