Suppr超能文献

乌干达北部接受产前检查的感染与未感染艾滋病毒孕妇中,流行病学研究中心抑郁量表在抑郁症筛查中的信度和效度:一项横断面研究

Reliability and validity of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale in screening for depression among HIV-infected and -uninfected pregnant women attending antenatal services in northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Natamba Barnabas K, Achan Jane, Arbach Angela, Oyok Thomas O, Ghosh Shibani, Mehta Saurabh, Stoltzfus Rebecca J, Griffiths Jeffrey K, Young Sera L

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 22;14:303. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0303-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the prevalence and approaches to screening for depression among pregnant women living in resource poor settings with high HIV burden.

METHODS

We studied the reliability and accuracy of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in 123 (36 HIV-infected and 87 -uninfected) pregnant women receiving antenatal care at Gulu Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda. CES-D scores were compared to results from the psychiatrist-administered Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) for current major depressive disorder (MDD), a "gold standard" for assessing depression. We employed measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and criterion validity [Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and positive predictive value (PPV)] to evaluate the reliability and validity of the CES-D scale.

RESULTS

35.8% of respondents were currently experiencing an MDD, as defined from outputs of the MINI-depression module. The CES-D had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and good discriminatory ability in detecting MINI-defined current MDDs (AUROC = 0.82). The optimum CES-D cutoff score for the identification of probable MDD was between 16 and 17. A CES-D cutoff score of 17, corresponding to Se, Sp, and PPV values of 72.7%, 78.5%, and 76.5%, is proposed for adoption in this population and performs well for HIV-infected and -uninfected women. After adjusting for baseline differences between the HIV subgroups (maternal age and marital status), HIV-infected pregnant women scored 6.2 points higher on the CES-D than HIV-uninfected women (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The CES-D is a suitable instrument for screening for probable major depression among pregnant women of mixed HIV status attending antenatal services in northern Uganda.

摘要

背景

在艾滋病毒负担高的资源匮乏地区,关于孕妇抑郁症筛查的患病率及方法的数据有限。

方法

我们在乌干达古卢地区转诊医院对123名接受产前护理的孕妇(36名感染艾滋病毒和87名未感染艾滋病毒)研究了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的可靠性和准确性。将CES-D评分与精神科医生实施的用于评估当前重度抑郁症(MDD)的迷你国际神经精神病学访谈(MINI)结果进行比较,MINI是评估抑郁症的“金标准”。我们采用内部一致性测量(克朗巴哈系数)和效标效度[受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、灵敏度(Se)、特异度(Sp)和阳性预测值(PPV)]来评估CES-D量表的可靠性和有效性。

结果

根据MINI抑郁模块的结果定义,35.8%的受访者目前患有重度抑郁症。CES-D具有较高的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数=0.92),在检测MINI定义的当前重度抑郁症方面具有良好的区分能力(AUROC=0.82)。识别可能的重度抑郁症的最佳CES-D临界值在16至17之间。建议采用CES-D临界值17,其对应的Se、Sp和PPV值分别为72.7%、78.5%和76.5%,该临界值在该人群中表现良好,对感染艾滋病毒和未感染艾滋病毒的女性均适用。在调整了艾滋病毒亚组之间的基线差异(产妇年龄和婚姻状况)后,感染艾滋病毒的孕妇在CES-D上的得分比未感染艾滋病毒的女性高6.2分(p=0.032)。

结论

CES-D是在乌干达北部为接受产前服务的不同艾滋病毒感染状况的孕妇筛查可能的重度抑郁症的合适工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ad4/4260190/031339e2ffe8/12888_2014_303_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验