Shaw P J, Bergmann B M, Rechtschaffen A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Am J Physiol. 1997 Feb;272(2 Pt 2):R682-90. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1997.272.2.R682.
Rats subjected to total sleep deprivation (TSD) by the disk-over-water method were provided with a continuously available operant by which they could increase ambient temperature (T(amb)). TSD rats progressively increased operant responses for heat to 700% of baseline levels. During the last quarter of sleep deprivation, they maintained mean T(amb) at 9 degrees C above baseline and held T(amb) over 40 degrees C for 35% of the day. In contrast, yoked control rats (TSC) did not change mean T(amb). Although both TSD and TSC rats showed a progressive decline in intraperitoneal temperature (T(ip)), TSD rats maintained an elevated T(amb) even during periods when T(ip) and brain temperatures (T(br)) were above baseline levels. Thus these results confirm and extend earlier findings that rats subjected to TSD show an increase in temperature set point (T(set)). The earlier studies, which utilized short daily trials in a thermal gradient, demonstrated an increase in T(set) early in the deprivation period. The present study, which obtained more extensive data on thermal preference at a range of body temperatures demonstrated an increasing T(amb) for almost all T(ip) and T(br) values, suggesting a progressive increase in T(set) over the course of sleep deprivation. Surprisingly, survival time was shorter than in previous TSD studies. Reduced survival could not be attributed to differences in T(br), T(ip), energy expenditure, or sleep loss from previous studies.
通过水盘法使大鼠完全睡眠剥夺(TSD),为其提供一种可连续操作的方式,通过这种方式它们可以提高环境温度(T(amb))。TSD大鼠对热量的操作性反应逐渐增加至基线水平的700%。在睡眠剥夺的最后四分之一阶段,它们将平均T(amb)维持在比基线高9摄氏度的水平,并使T(amb)在一天中的35%时间内保持在40摄氏度以上。相比之下,配对对照大鼠(TSC)的平均T(amb)没有变化。虽然TSD和TSC大鼠的腹腔内温度(T(ip))都呈逐渐下降趋势,但即使在T(ip)和脑温(T(br))高于基线水平的时期,TSD大鼠仍能维持较高的T(amb)。因此,这些结果证实并扩展了早期的研究发现,即遭受TSD的大鼠体温设定点(T(set))升高。早期的研究在热梯度中采用每日短时间试验,证明在剥夺期早期T(set)升高。本研究在一系列体温下获得了关于热偏好的更广泛数据,表明几乎所有T(ip)和T(br)值对应的T(amb)都在增加,这表明在睡眠剥夺过程中T(set)逐渐升高。令人惊讶的是,存活时间比之前的TSD研究更短。存活时间缩短不能归因于T(br)、T(ip)、能量消耗或与之前研究相比的睡眠缺失差异。