Morris S, Eccles R, Martez S J, Riker D K, Witek T J
Common Cold Centre, School of Molecular & Medical Biosciences, University of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Am J Rhinol. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(2):109-15. doi: 10.2500/105065897782537197.
This was a randomized, double-blind vehicle controlled study aimed at investigating the effects on nasal function of 7 days treatment with the topical decongestant oxymetazoline (0.05% w/v). Fifty healthy volunteers took part in the study and these were randomly allocated to three treatment groups (i) daily oxymetazoline (b.i.d. 150 microliters per nostril) (ii) intermittent oxymetazoline, with oxymetazoline being substituted for vehicle at the morning doses on days 1, 3, and 7; and (iii) daily vehicle (b.i.d. 150 microliters per nostril). The nasal airway was assessed by measurement of nasal airway resistance (NAR) using posterior rhinomanometry, subjective scaling of nasal patency by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS), and clinical visual examination. On days 1, 2, 3, and 7, NAR and VAS measurements were obtained before the morning dose and up to 6 hours after dosing; clinical visual examinations were also performed before dosing on these days. NAR and VAS measurements were also made following withdrawal of treatment on Days 8 and 9. Nonparametric analysis of the results showed that therapeutic tolerance to oxymetazoline did not develop over the 7-day treatment period, and visual examination of the nasal mucosa failed to find significant evidence of rhinitis. Evidence of rebound nasal congestion was found following 3 days of oxymetazoline treatment, with baseline NAR within the daily and intermittent oxymetazoline groups being significantly greater on Day 3 compared to Day 1 (p < 0.05). However, there was a trend toward increasing baseline NAR in the vehicle group over the course of the study, suggesting that the vehicle may have contributed to the rebound congestion. Following the withdrawal of treatments, only the intermittent oxymetazoline group had significantly higher NAR on Days 8 and 9 compared to Day 1 (p < 0.05). Subjective VAS measurements generally followed trends in NAR.
这是一项随机、双盲、赋形剂对照研究,旨在调查局部减充血剂羟甲唑啉(0.05% w/v)7天治疗对鼻功能的影响。五十名健康志愿者参与了该研究,他们被随机分配到三个治疗组:(i)每日使用羟甲唑啉(每侧鼻孔每日两次,每次150微升);(ii)间歇性使用羟甲唑啉,在第1、3和7天的早晨剂量时用羟甲唑啉替代赋形剂;(iii)每日使用赋形剂(每侧鼻孔每日两次,每次150微升)。通过使用后鼻测压法测量鼻气道阻力(NAR)、借助视觉模拟量表(VAS)对鼻通畅度进行主观评分以及临床视觉检查来评估鼻气道。在第1、2、3和7天,在早晨剂量前以及给药后长达6小时获取NAR和VAS测量值;在这些日子给药前也进行临床视觉检查。在第8和9天停药后也进行NAR和VAS测量。结果的非参数分析表明,在7天治疗期内未出现对羟甲唑啉的治疗耐受性,并且鼻黏膜的视觉检查未发现鼻炎的显著证据。在羟甲唑啉治疗3天后发现有鼻充血反弹的证据,每日和间歇性使用羟甲唑啉组第3天的基线NAR相比第1天显著更高(p < 0.05)。然而,在研究过程中赋形剂组的基线NAR有增加趋势,表明赋形剂可能导致了充血反弹。停药后,仅间歇性使用羟甲唑啉组在第8和9天的NAR相比第1天显著更高(p < 0.05)。主观VAS测量结果总体上遵循NAR的趋势。