Suppr超能文献

烟草政策评级表:一种评估工作场所和部落吸烟控制政策的工具。

Tobacco policy rating form: a tool for evaluating worksite and tribal smoking control policies.

作者信息

Glasgow R E, Boles S M, Lichtenstein E, Strycker L A

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, Eugene 97403-1983, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 1996 Winter;5(4):286-91. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.4.286.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report on the development and validation of a rating scale to code the various components of written tobacco policies.

DESIGN

A one-page Tobacco Policy Rating Form (TPRF) was developed to apply to written policies in both worksites and American Indian tribes. Fifteen worksite and 24 tribal tobacco policies from a diverse set of companies and tribes of varying size and economic status were rated on the TPRF by two separate sets of experienced and inexperienced raters. Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) was computed to measure inter-rater agreement.

RESULTS

The scale was found to produce a high level of agreement when used by both experienced and inexperienced raters on both tribal and worksite policies. For experienced raters, W = 0.92, P < 0.0001 for tribal policies and W = 0.97, P < 0.0001 for worksite policies; for inexperienced raters, W = 0.89, P < 0.0001 for tribal policies and W = 0.96, P < 0.0001 for worksite policies.

CONCLUSIONS

The TPRF seems worthy of future use as a tool to rate the strength and comprehensiveness of written tobacco policies. It may be extended to other settings such as schools and municipalities, or used by investigators studying behavioural or economic consequences of smoking policies. Those interested in policy change may find the TPRF useful as a way of describing existing policies and as a quantitative measure of change.

摘要

目的

报告一种用于对书面烟草政策的各个组成部分进行编码的评分量表的开发与验证情况。

设计

制定了一份单页的《烟草政策评分表》(TPRF),以适用于工作场所和美国印第安部落的书面政策。两组分别由经验丰富和缺乏经验的评分者,根据TPRF对来自不同规模和经济状况的公司及部落的15项工作场所烟草政策和24项部落烟草政策进行评分。计算肯德尔和谐系数(W)以衡量评分者间的一致性。

结果

经验丰富和缺乏经验的评分者在对部落和工作场所政策使用该量表时,均达成了高度一致。对于经验丰富的评分者,部落政策的W = 0.92,P < 0.0001;工作场所政策的W = 0.97,P < 0.0001。对于缺乏经验的评分者,部落政策的W = 0.89,P < 0.0001;工作场所政策的W = 0.96,P < 0.0001。

结论

TPRF似乎值得在未来用作评估书面烟草政策的力度和全面性的工具。它可扩展至其他环境,如学校和市政当局,或供研究吸烟政策的行为或经济后果的研究人员使用。对政策变革感兴趣的人士可能会发现TPRF有助于描述现有政策,并作为变革的定量衡量标准。

相似文献

3
Tobacco policy regression in Arizona worksites.亚利桑那州工作场所的烟草政策回归
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(1):22-4. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.22.
5
Smoking policies in small worksites in Minnesota.
Am J Health Promot. 2007 May-Jun;21(5):416-21. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.5.416.
6
Tobacco-free policies at worksites in Kansas.堪萨斯州工作场所的无烟政策。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 12;17(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4277-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验