Johnson S, Prosser D, Bindman J, Szmukler G
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;32(3):137-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00794612.
Very few useful measures of service functioning are as yet available for the evaluation of mental health services. Continuity of care has been identified as "the strategic first choice" for the development of such process measures. The term "continuity" has been used to refer to a variety of important aspects of service functioning, including whether services maintain contact with patients, whether patients consistently see the same staff, success of transfer between services, degree to which plans for services are followed through, integration between service providers, and comprehensiveness in meeting patient's individual needs. In this paper, we reviewed the main theoretical definitions of continuity of care for the severely mentally ill, and discussed the work that has attempted to operationalise these definitions and to apply them in the study of mental health services. We concluded that whilst continuity of care has had a central place in theoretical discussions of community service planning, progress in developing and applying practical measures has so far been sporadic and limited. Obstacles to such research have included great diversity in definitions of continuity and the confounding influence of individual patient characteristics on the relationship between service process and outcome. Despite these limitations, research in this field has indicated that developing and applying measures of continuity of care may be feasible and produce useful results with findings of some of the studies suggesting a relationship between continuity of care and individual outcome.
目前,几乎没有可用的有效服务功能衡量指标来评估心理健康服务。连续性照护已被确定为制定此类过程指标的“战略首选”。“连续性”一词已被用于指代服务功能的多个重要方面,包括服务机构是否与患者保持联系、患者是否始终由同一批工作人员接待、服务机构之间转接的成效、服务计划的执行程度、服务提供者之间的整合情况以及满足患者个体需求的全面性。在本文中,我们回顾了针对重症精神病患者连续性照护的主要理论定义,并讨论了试图将这些定义付诸实践并应用于心理健康服务研究的工作。我们得出的结论是,虽然连续性照护在社区服务规划的理论讨论中占据核心地位,但迄今为止,在开发和应用实际衡量指标方面的进展一直是零星且有限的。此类研究的障碍包括连续性定义的巨大差异以及个体患者特征对服务过程与结果之间关系的混杂影响。尽管存在这些局限性,但该领域的研究表明,开发和应用连续性照护衡量指标可能是可行的,并能产生有用的结果,一些研究结果表明连续性照护与个体结局之间存在关联。