Nissen J M, Boumans N P, Landeweerd J A
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Int J Nurs Stud. 1997 Apr;34(2):93-102. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(96)00039-9.
In an 850-bed Dutch hospital a study was carried out to compare the quality-of-care scores of a Primary Nursing group and a lagged experimental group. Process as well as outcome aspects of quality of care were investigated. The study consisted of three measuring moments: one pre-intervention at t1, March 1992, and two post-intervention moments at t2, November 1992 and t3, May 1993. The intervention was formed by the implementation of Primary Nursing in two experimental units after t1; this is the experimental group. After t2, Primary Nursing was also implemented in the three control units; this is the lagged experimental group. The process aspects of quality of care were covered by three dimensions: coordination of care, instrumental aspects of care and expressive aspects of care. The outcome aspects of quality of care were measured by evaluating four patient variables: self-care, initiative, patient stress and patient satisfaction. ANOVAs were used to test for significant differences between the experimental and lagged experimental group. The only significant difference in favour of the Primary Nursing group was found on the variable instrumental aspects of care. On the other variables no expected changes were observed. Finally, the implications of the findings are discussed.
在一家拥有850张床位的荷兰医院进行了一项研究,以比较初级护理组和滞后实验组的护理质量得分。对护理质量的过程和结果方面进行了调查。该研究包括三个测量时刻:1992年3月t1的一次干预前测量,以及1992年11月t2和1993年5月t3的两次干预后测量。干预措施是在t1之后在两个实验单元实施初级护理;这就是实验组。在t2之后,三个对照单元也实施了初级护理;这就是滞后实验组。护理质量的过程方面涵盖三个维度:护理协调、护理工具方面和护理表达方面。护理质量的结果方面通过评估四个患者变量来衡量:自我护理、主动性、患者压力和患者满意度。使用方差分析来检验实验组和滞后实验组之间的显著差异。在护理工具方面的变量上发现了唯一有利于初级护理组的显著差异。在其他变量上未观察到预期的变化。最后,讨论了研究结果的含义。