Suppr超能文献

使用经验抽样数据验证心肌灌注显像-延迟左室强化(MPI-DLV)

Validating the MPI-DLV using experience sampling data.

作者信息

Lousberg R, Schmidt A J, Groenman N H, Vendrig L, Dijkman-Caes C I

机构信息

Center for Pain Expertise, Academic Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 1997 Apr;20(2):195-206. doi: 10.1023/a:1025534812341.

Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between scale scores on the Dutch version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-DLV) and data derived from comparable items from an experience sampling procedure. Fifty-seven chronic pain patients participated in the study, which lasted 6 consecutive days. Special attention was given to the relationship between the MPI-DLV pain intensity score and the mean experience sampling pain intensity score. Significant correlations were found between the MPI-DLV scales Pain Severity, Interference, Solicitous, Punishing and Distracting Responses, and Household Chores and their experience sampling analogues. A marginally significant correlation was found with regard to the MPI-DLV Life Control scale. The General Activity and Affective Distress scales had no relationship with the analogous experience sampling items. The significant correlations were regarded as further validation of the MPI-DLV. A regression analysis revealed that 58% of the variance of the experience sampling pain intensity score could be explained by the MPI-DLV present pain intensity item score.

摘要

本研究调查了荷兰版多维疼痛量表(MPI-DLV)的量表得分与来自经验抽样程序中可比项目的数据之间的关系。57名慢性疼痛患者参与了这项为期6天的研究。特别关注了MPI-DLV疼痛强度得分与经验抽样疼痛强度平均得分之间的关系。在MPI-DLV量表的疼痛严重程度、干扰、关怀、惩罚和分散注意力反应以及家务方面与它们的经验抽样类似物之间发现了显著相关性。在MPI-DLV生活控制量表方面发现了边缘显著相关性。一般活动和情感困扰量表与类似的经验抽样项目没有关系。这些显著相关性被视为对MPI-DLV的进一步验证。回归分析显示,经验抽样疼痛强度得分方差的58%可以由MPI-DLV当前疼痛强度项目得分解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验