Suppr超能文献

NOSGER(老年患者护士观察量表)的验证:一种照护者评定工具的信度和效度

Validation of the NOSGER (Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients): reliability and validity of a caregiver rating instrument.

作者信息

Wahle M, Häller S, Spiegel R

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 1996 Winter;8(4):525-47. doi: 10.1017/s1041610296002864.

Abstract

The Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER) is a rating scale for use in geriatric patients that can be applied by nurses or other caregivers. It deals with the daily behavior of elderly patients and measures impairment in six areas (dimensions): memory; instrumental activities of daily living (IADL); (basic) activities of daily living (ADL); mood; social behavior; and disturbing behavior. Objectivity, stability, construct validity, and acceptance of the scale have been established in previous studies using an earlier version of the NOSGER. The present validation study considered 50 healthy old subjects, 25 patients with mild dementia, 25 patients with advanced (mostly moderate according to DSM-III-R criteria) dementia, and 25 elderly patients with depression. The NOSGER was completed by relatives in the case of subjects living in their own homes and by nurses or other caregivers for institutionalized subjects. In addition to the NOSGER, selected tests of concentration, memory, and performance were applied as outside criteria. Interrater reliability (objectivity) was estimated by variance component analysis. Values between rtt = .68 and rtt = .89 (all p < .001) were found for the six NOSGER dimensions, the values being higher for the cognitive dimensions (memory, IADL, ADL) than for the noncognitive ones (mood, social behavior, disturbing behavior). Retest reliability (stability), which was calculated via rank order correlations, was somewhat higher for the cognitive NOSGER dimensions (memory rs = .91, IADL rs = .92, ADL rs = .88; p < .001) than for the noncognitive ones (mood rs = .85, social behavior rs = .87, disturbing behavior rs = .84; p < .001). All these values satisfy the level of rtt > or = .80 required in accordance with psychometric standards. The concurrent validity of the NOSGER dimensions was assessed using correlations with external criteria with which similarity of content was expected. The NOSGER dimensions memory, IADL, ADL, and social behavior were found to correlate closely with external criteria of similar content, whereas no satisfactory concurrent validities were found for the dimensions mood or disturbing behavior. The NOSGER dimensions were also correlated with a number of unrelated external criteria so as to reveal any discordances. For the dimensions memory, IADL, ADL, and social behavior, no clear-cut discriminant validities were found. This suggests that these four dimensions may function as parameters not just of different areas of behavior, but also of a general factor that might be described as "cognitive intactness." As a further aspect of construct validity, significant differences (all p < .001) between the four groups of subjects were found in five of the six NOSGER dimensions (memory, IADL, ADL, mood, social behavior): The healthy subjects differed significantly from all three patient groups in five of the six dimensions; the moderately demented group differed from the depressed group in four of the six dimensions and from the mildly demented group in two of the six dimensions; and the mildly demented group differed significantly from the depressed group in terms of mood (significance levels are after application of the Bonferroni correction). Significant group differences (p generally < .001) were also found for most of the objective performance tests used (data not presented).

摘要

老年患者护士观察量表(NOSGER)是一种供护士或其他护理人员用于老年患者的评定量表。它涉及老年患者的日常行为,并对六个方面(维度)的功能损害进行测量:记忆力;日常生活工具性活动(IADL);(基本)日常生活活动(ADL);情绪;社会行为;以及干扰行为。使用NOSGER早期版本的先前研究已确立了该量表的客观性、稳定性、结构效度和可接受性。本效度研究纳入了50名健康老年人、25名轻度痴呆患者、25名重度(根据DSM - III - R标准大多为中度)痴呆患者以及25名老年抑郁症患者。对于居家生活的受试者,由其亲属完成NOSGER量表;对于机构收容的受试者,则由护士或其他护理人员完成。除了NOSGER量表外,还应用了选定的注意力、记忆力和执行能力测试作为外部标准。通过方差成分分析估计评定者间信度(客观性)。NOSGER六个维度的rtt值在0.68至0.89之间(所有p < 0.001),认知维度(记忆力、IADL、ADL)的值高于非认知维度(情绪、社会行为、干扰行为)。通过等级相关计算得出的重测信度(稳定性),认知NOSGER维度(记忆力rs = 0.91,IADL rs = 0.92,ADL rs = 0.88;p < 0.001)略高于非认知维度(情绪rs = 0.85,社会行为rs = 0.87,干扰行为rs = 0.84;p < 0.001)。所有这些值均符合心理测量标准要求的rtt≥0.80的水平。使用与预期内容相似的外部标准的相关性来评估NOSGER维度的同时效度。发现NOSGER维度中的记忆力、IADL、ADL和社会行为与相似内容的外部标准密切相关,而情绪或干扰行为维度未发现令人满意的同时效度。NOSGER维度还与一些不相关的外部标准相关,以揭示任何不一致之处。对于记忆力、IADL、ADL和社会行为维度,未发现明确的区分效度。这表明这四个维度可能不仅作为不同行为领域的参数,还可能作为一个可描述为“认知完整性”的一般因素的参数。作为结构效度的另一个方面,在NOSGER六个维度中的五个维度(记忆力、IADL、ADL、情绪、社会行为)上发现四组受试者之间存在显著差异(所有p < 0.001):健康受试者在六个维度中的五个维度上与所有三个患者组有显著差异;中度痴呆组在六个维度中的四个维度上与抑郁症组不同,在六个维度中的两个维度上与轻度痴呆组不同;轻度痴呆组在情绪方面与抑郁症组有显著差异(显著性水平是在应用Bonferroni校正之后)。对于所使用的大多数客观执行能力测试也发现了显著的组间差异(未列出数据,p通常< 0.001)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验