• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在同一样本中,将两种诊断测试与同一“金标准”进行比较。

Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.

作者信息

Bloch D A

机构信息

Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5092, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 1997 Mar;53(1):73-85.

PMID:9147604
Abstract

Methods are proposed for comparing two diagnostic tests for the same data where a threshold for positive for each test is specified. One method contrasts the diagnostic tests' estimated risks. A second method compares the two tests' kappa coefficients. When thresholds for positive test results are specified a priori, maximum likelihood estimators and their asymptotic variances are derived and test statistics are presented for both case-control and naturalistic methods of sampling. The bootstrap is proposed as a method to assess differences in risk estimators when thresholds for positive test results are chosen by scanning the data. Examples are given to illustrate the methods.

摘要

提出了一些方法,用于针对相同数据比较两种诊断测试,其中为每种测试指定了阳性阈值。一种方法是对比诊断测试的估计风险。第二种方法是比较两种测试的kappa系数。当预先指定阳性测试结果的阈值时,推导最大似然估计量及其渐近方差,并给出针对病例对照抽样方法和自然抽样方法的检验统计量。当通过扫描数据来选择阳性测试结果的阈值时,建议使用自助法来评估风险估计量的差异。给出了示例来说明这些方法。

相似文献

1
Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.在同一样本中,将两种诊断测试与同一“金标准”进行比较。
Biometrics. 1997 Mar;53(1):73-85.
2
Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.对同一受试者进行的多项二分类诊断试验的加权 Kappa 系数比较。
Stat Med. 2010 Sep 10;29(20):2149-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.3939.
3
A sequential design to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic or screening test.一种用于估计诊断或筛查试验敏感性和特异性的序贯设计。
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3458-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.2451.
4
Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.两种二元筛查试验相对真阳性率和假阳性率的验证性偏倚校正估计量。
Stat Med. 2005 Feb 15;24(3):403-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.1959.
5
Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.在没有金标准检测的情况下,用于患病率和诊断试验研究的贝叶斯样本量确定
Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):388-97. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00183.x.
6
Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squares.使用加权最小二乘法对来自同一受试者样本的两种诊断测试的预测值进行比较。
Stat Med. 2006 Jul 15;25(13):2215-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.2332.
7
Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.评估两种诊断测试联合使用时诊断性能的提升情况。
Stat Med. 2002 Sep 15;21(17):2527-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.1227.
8
Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.诊断试验性能的潜在类别分析见解。
Biostatistics. 2007 Apr;8(2):474-84. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl038. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
9
Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.配对设计中两种二元诊断试验似然比的比较。
Stat Med. 2007 Sep 30;26(22):4179-201. doi: 10.1002/sim.2850.
10
Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.在没有金标准的情况下对ROC曲线进行非参数估计。
Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):600-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00324.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Up-Front PET/CT and MRI for Detecting Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in T1-T2 Oral Cavity Cancer-A Prospective Cohort Study.upfront PET/CT与MRI对T1-T2期口腔癌颈部淋巴结转移的诊断准确性——一项前瞻性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;13(22):3414. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223414.
2
A scoping review of autoantibodies as biomarkers for canine autoimmune disease.自身抗体作为犬自身免疫性疾病生物标志物的范围综述。
J Vet Intern Med. 2022 Mar;36(2):363-378. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16392. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
A Software Tool for Calculating the Uncertainty of Diagnostic Accuracy Measures.
一种用于计算诊断准确性测量不确定度的软件工具。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 27;11(3):406. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030406.
4
Can Be Effectively and Economically Detected Using Hive Debris and Conventional PCR.使用蜂巢碎片和传统聚合酶链式反应(PCR)可进行有效且经济的检测。
Insects. 2021 Feb 9;12(2):150. doi: 10.3390/insects12020150.
5
A Software Tool for Exploring the Relation between Diagnostic Accuracy and Measurement Uncertainty.一种用于探究诊断准确性与测量不确定度之间关系的软件工具。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 19;10(9):610. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090610.
6
Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter.用于青光眼筛查的居家视野测试与汉弗莱视野计的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 12;12:2597-2606. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S187832. eCollection 2018.
7
The Duesseldorf warning signs for primary immunodeficiency: is it time to change the rules?原发性免疫缺陷的杜塞尔多夫警示标志:是时候改变规则了吗?
J Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;35(3):273-9. doi: 10.1007/s10875-015-0149-1. Epub 2015 Mar 8.
8
Change in CA 19-9 levels after chemoradiotherapy predicts survival in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.放化疗后 CA19-9 水平的变化可预测局部晚期不可切除胰腺癌患者的生存情况。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Dec;4(4):361-9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.045.
9
Appraisal of immunoglobulin free light chain as a marker of response.评估免疫球蛋白游离轻链作为反应标志物的情况。
Blood. 2008 May 15;111(10):4908-15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-138602. Epub 2008 Mar 25.