Suppr超能文献

在同一样本中,将两种诊断测试与同一“金标准”进行比较。

Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.

作者信息

Bloch D A

机构信息

Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5092, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 1997 Mar;53(1):73-85.

PMID:9147604
Abstract

Methods are proposed for comparing two diagnostic tests for the same data where a threshold for positive for each test is specified. One method contrasts the diagnostic tests' estimated risks. A second method compares the two tests' kappa coefficients. When thresholds for positive test results are specified a priori, maximum likelihood estimators and their asymptotic variances are derived and test statistics are presented for both case-control and naturalistic methods of sampling. The bootstrap is proposed as a method to assess differences in risk estimators when thresholds for positive test results are chosen by scanning the data. Examples are given to illustrate the methods.

摘要

提出了一些方法,用于针对相同数据比较两种诊断测试,其中为每种测试指定了阳性阈值。一种方法是对比诊断测试的估计风险。第二种方法是比较两种测试的kappa系数。当预先指定阳性测试结果的阈值时,推导最大似然估计量及其渐近方差,并给出针对病例对照抽样方法和自然抽样方法的检验统计量。当通过扫描数据来选择阳性测试结果的阈值时,建议使用自助法来评估风险估计量的差异。给出了示例来说明这些方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验