Kulp M T, Schmidt P P
Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, USA.
Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Jan;74(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199701000-00018.
Although a substantial body of research has demonstrated an association between reading and eye movements, this association has not been examined in kindergartners. Therefore, the relation between psychometric eye movement scores and reading skill was studied in a masked investigation with 181 kindergartners and first graders (mean age 6.25 years) from a middle class, suburban, elementary school near Cleveland, Ohio. Eye movements were evaluated with the New York State Optometric Association King-Devick (NYSOA K-D; Bernell Corporation, South Bend, IN) and the Developmental Eye Movement tests (DEM; Bernell Corporation, South Bend, IN). Digit knowledge was assessed with Reversals Frequency Test Execution subtest (Gardner). Reading performance was measured with Metropolitan Achievement Test 6 (MAT6) Reading Test and teachers' assessments. The number of unknown or reversed numbers on Gardner was significantly related to test times on the NYSOA K-D and DEM, but not the DEM ratio. Outcome on NYSOA K-D, determined by errors in conjunction with test time, was significantly related to reading ability in 5-year-olds (p = 0.0129), 6-year-olds (p = 0.0167), and the entire subject group when controlling for age (p = 0.0008). Our findings suggest that: (1) DEM factors out automaticity of number knowledge; (2) the NYSOA K-D can be completed by kindergartners; (3) the DEM is too difficult for many kindergarteners; and (4) performance on the NYSOA K-D is related to reading performance in 5- and 6-year-olds in kindergarten.
尽管大量研究表明阅读与眼动之间存在关联,但尚未在幼儿园儿童中对此关联进行研究。因此,在一项盲法调查中,对来自俄亥俄州克利夫兰附近一个中产阶级郊区小学的181名幼儿园儿童和一年级学生(平均年龄6.25岁)进行了心理测量眼动分数与阅读技能之间关系的研究。使用纽约州验光协会金 - 德维克测试(NYSOA K - D;伯内尔公司,印第安纳州南本德)和发育性眼动测试(DEM;伯内尔公司,印第安纳州南本德)评估眼动。用反转频率测试执行子测试(加德纳)评估数字知识。用大都会成就测试6(MAT6)阅读测试和教师评估来衡量阅读表现。加德纳测试中未知或反转数字的数量与NYSOA K - D和DEM的测试时间显著相关,但与DEM比率无关。由错误和测试时间共同决定的NYSOA K - D结果与5岁儿童(p = 0.0129)、6岁儿童(p = 0.0167)以及在控制年龄时整个受试者组的阅读能力显著相关(p = 0.0008)。我们的研究结果表明:(1)DEM排除了数字知识的自动性;(2)幼儿园儿童可以完成NYSOA K - D测试;(3)DEM对许多幼儿园儿童来说太难了;(4)NYSOA K - D的表现与幼儿园5岁和6岁儿童的阅读表现相关。