• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Development and validation of a computerized screening test for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.

作者信息

Neal L A, Fox C, Carroll N, Holden M, Barnes P

机构信息

Defence Services Psychiatric Centre, Duchess of Kent Military Hospital, Catterick Garrison, North Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Apr;95(4):351-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09643.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09643.x
PMID:9150831
Abstract

The available self-report instruments designed to measure personality disorder (PD) are time-consuming to administer and/or score and can be impractical for routine clinical use. There is a need for a computerized method of personality assessment based on contemporary systems of classification. A computerized DSM-III-R-based questionnaire was developed and validated against the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R Axis-II disorders on a sample of 60 subjects. The computerized test showed moderate validity as a diagnostic instrument (mean kappa coefficient = 0.47). With adjusted cut-off scores it was valid as a screening instrument (mean sensitivity = 0.87). Antisocial, borderline and avoidant PD scores were strongly correlated across measures and not subject to significant observer bias.

摘要

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a computerized screening test for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Apr;95(4):351-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09643.x.
2
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
3
Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders.用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍的诊断清单与结构化访谈的比较。
Psychopathology. 1994;27(6):312-20. doi: 10.1159/000284889.
4
Factor structure of DSM-III-R personality disorders shown by self-report questionnaire: implications for classifying and assessing personality disorders.自我报告问卷显示的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》(DSM-III-R)人格障碍的因素结构:对人格障碍分类和评估的启示
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Dec;84(6):555-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03194.x.
5
Toward an empirical/theoretical grouping of the DSM-III-R personality disorders.迈向对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版人格障碍的实证/理论分组
J Pers Disord. 1997 Summer;11(2):191-8. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.2.191.
6
SCID II interviews and the SCID Screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中人格障碍诊断工具的分裂样人格障碍访谈和分裂样人格障碍筛查问卷。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Aug;90(2):120-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01566.x.
7
Diagnosing personality disorders in psychiatric inpatients.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Mar;83(3):206-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb05526.x.
8
Psychometric characteristics of the cluster B personality disorders under DSM-III-R and DSM-IV.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和第四版(DSM-IV)中B类人格障碍的心理测量特征。
J Pers Disord. 1997 Fall;11(3):270-8. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.270.
9
DSM-III-R personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: an empirical comparison.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中的人格障碍与人格五因素模型:一项实证比较
J Abnorm Psychol. 1992 Aug;101(3):553-60. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.553.
10
A comparison of two interviews for DSM-III-R personality disorders.针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)人格障碍的两次访谈之比较。
Psychiatry Res. 1990 Apr;32(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(90)90138-u.