Suppr超能文献

用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍的诊断清单与结构化访谈的比较。

Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders.

作者信息

Bronisch T, Mombour W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute, Max Planck Institute, Munich, FRG.

出版信息

Psychopathology. 1994;27(6):312-20. doi: 10.1159/000284889.

Abstract

The International Diagnostic Checklists for the assessment of the DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders (IDCL-P) were compared with a structured interview, the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), using a balanced test-retest design with forty psychiatric inpatients. The results, using pairwise kappa for the calculation of agreement, were as follows: any personality disorder versus no personality disorder 0.52 for DSM-III-R diagnoses and 0.75 for ICD-10 diagnoses. The range for the single personality disorders diagnosed at least five times was from -0.07 to 0.71 for DSM-III-R diagnoses and from 0.38 to 0.68 for ICD-10 diagnoses. Only for DSM-III-R diagnoses do figures exist from three other studies comparing two structured interviews with each other. The results of all four studies suggest that 60% of the variance in personality disorder diagnoses represents variance not attributable to the patients, which is scientifically unacceptable.

摘要

使用平衡的重测设计,对40名精神科住院患者,将用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍的国际诊断清单(IDCL-P)与一种结构化访谈工具——国际人格障碍检查表(IPDE)进行了比较。采用两两kappa系数计算一致性,结果如下:对于DSM-III-R诊断,有任何人格障碍与无人格障碍的一致性为0.52;对于ICD-10诊断,一致性为0.75。在至少诊断五次的单一人格障碍中,DSM-III-R诊断的范围为-0.07至0.71,ICD-10诊断的范围为0.38至0.68。只有DSM-III-R诊断有另外三项比较两种结构化访谈的研究数据。所有四项研究的结果表明,人格障碍诊断中60%的差异是不可归因于患者的差异,这在科学上是不可接受的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验