• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中人格障碍诊断工具的分裂样人格障碍访谈和分裂样人格障碍筛查问卷。

SCID II interviews and the SCID Screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.

作者信息

Ekselius L, Lindström E, von Knorring L, Bodlund O, Kullgren G

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Aug;90(2):120-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01566.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01566.x
PMID:7976457
Abstract

A modified version of the SCID Screen questionnaire covering 103 criteria by means of 124 questions was compared with SCID II interviews in 69 psychiatric patients. The correlation between the number of criteria fulfilled in the SCID II interviews or the questionnaires was 0.84. In the SCID interviews, 54% of the patients had a personality disorder. When the SCID Screen questionnaire was used, 73% had a personality disorder. When the cut-off level for diagnosis was adjusted, the frequency found by means of the SCID screen questionnaire or the interviews was roughly the same, 58% and 54%, respectively. The overall kappa for agreement between the SCID II interviews and questionnaire with adjusted cut-off was 0.78.

摘要

将一份涵盖103项标准、通过124个问题的SCID筛查问卷的修改版,与69名精神科患者的SCID II访谈进行了比较。SCID II访谈或问卷中满足的标准数量之间的相关性为0.84。在SCID访谈中,54%的患者患有精神障碍。使用SCID筛查问卷时,73%的患者患有精神障碍。当调整诊断的临界值时,通过SCID筛查问卷或访谈发现的频率大致相同,分别为58%和54%。调整临界值后,SCID II访谈与问卷之间总体一致性的kappa值为0.78。

相似文献

1
SCID II interviews and the SCID Screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中人格障碍诊断工具的分裂样人格障碍访谈和分裂样人格障碍筛查问卷。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Aug;90(2):120-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01566.x.
2
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
3
Personality traits and disorders among transsexuals.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Nov;88(5):322-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03467.x.
4
Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders.用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍的诊断清单与结构化访谈的比较。
Psychopathology. 1994;27(6):312-20. doi: 10.1159/000284889.
5
Diagnostic efficiency among psychiatric outpatients of a self-report version of a subset of screen items of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Personality Disorders (SCID-II).DSM-IV-TR 人格障碍定式临床访谈量表(SCID-II)筛查项目子集的自报告版本对精神科门诊患者的诊断效率。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):945-52. doi: 10.1037/a0021047.
6
Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴II人格障碍结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)2.0版的评定者间信度和内部一致性
J Pers Disord. 1997 Fall;11(3):279-84. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.279.
7
Twelve-month test-retest reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders in cocaine-dependent patients.可卡因依赖患者中DSM-III-R人格障碍结构化临床访谈的12个月重测信度。
Compr Psychiatry. 1995 Sep-Oct;36(5):384-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(95)90120-5.
8
A comparison of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorder criteria in an out-patient population.门诊人群中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)与《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)人格障碍标准的比较。
Psychol Med. 1996 Jan;26(1):151-60. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700033791.
9
The effects of changing axis II diagnostic criteria.
Compr Psychiatry. 1992 Jul-Aug;33(4):245-52. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90048-u.
10
Development and validation of a computerized screening test for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Apr;95(4):351-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09643.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The St. Göran Project: A Multipronged Strategy for Longitudinal Studies for Bipolar Disorders.圣戈兰项目:双相情感障碍纵向研究的多管齐下策略。
Neuropsychobiology. 2025;84(2):86-99. doi: 10.1159/000543335. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
Prevalence of autistic traits and their relationships with other psychopathological domains in young adults seeking psychiatric attention: a cluster analysis.寻求精神科关注的年轻成年人中自闭症特征的流行情况及其与其他精神病理学领域的关系:聚类分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 23;67(1):e71. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1791.
3
Volatile Organic Compounds From Breath Differ Between Patients With Major Depression and Healthy Controls.
重度抑郁症患者与健康对照者呼出的挥发性有机化合物存在差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 12;13:819607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.819607. eCollection 2022.
4
Self- but not other-mentalizing moderates the association between BPD symptoms and somatic complaints in community-dwelling adolescents.自体心智化而非他体心智化调节了 BPD 症状与社区青少年躯体主诉之间的关联。
Psychol Psychother. 2022 Dec;95(4):905-920. doi: 10.1111/papt.12409. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
Autism spectrum disorder and personality disorders: Comorbidity and differential diagnosis.自闭症谱系障碍与人格障碍:共病与鉴别诊断。
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 19;11(12):1366-1386. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i12.1366.
6
Isoforms of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor in stress-related mental disorders: a cross-sectional study.应激相关精神障碍中可溶性血管内皮生长因子同工型:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 17;11(1):16693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96313-8.
7
An unusual presentation of Huntington's disease.亨廷顿舞蹈症的一种罕见表现形式。
Clin Case Rep. 2021 Jul 16;9(7):e04547. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4547. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Is obsessive-compulsive personality disorder related to stress-related exhaustion?强迫型人格障碍与压力相关的疲惫有关吗?
Brain Behav. 2021 Jun;11(6):e02171. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2171. Epub 2021 May 10.
9
Swedish Universities Scales of Personality: Relation to Other Personality Instruments.瑞典大学人格量表:与其他人格测量工具的关系。
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 May;18(5):373-384. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0052. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
10
Clinical Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Imagery Rescripting Only Compared to Imagery Rescripting and Schema Therapy in Adult Patients With PTSD and Comorbid Cluster C Personality Disorder: Study Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial.仅意象重述与意象重述加图式疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍合并C类人格障碍成年患者的临床疗效及成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究设计
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 19;12:633614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.633614. eCollection 2021.