Oyola R, Arce R, Alegría A E, García C
Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, PR 00931, USA.
Photochem Photobiol. 1997 May;65(5):802-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb01927.x.
Absorption and emission techniques were used to characterize the ground (S0), singlet (S1) and triplet states (T1) of gilvocarcin V (GV) and gilvocarcin M (GM) in different solvents. Aggregation of GV with dimerization constant equal to 7800 M-1 is observed in 10% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO)/water. The photophysical properties of the S1 state of these molecules are more sensitive to changes in solvent characteristics than the corresponding ground states. The absorption of visible light by GV and GM results in a higher dipole moment of the excited state causing a red shift in the fluorescence spectra with increasing solvent polarity. The fluorescence quantum yield remains practically unchanged with changes in solvent properties unless water is present as a co-solvent. Both phi f and tau f values corresponding to GV in DMSO are larger than those of GM, whereas in 10% DMSO/H2O the opposite is observed. Thus, GV is more susceptible to other deactivation pathways besides emission in the presence of water than GM. The relative phosphorescence quantum yield (phi p = 0.03) and the triplet energy (ET = 52 kcal/mol) of GV and GM are similar. The S0-S1 energy difference is 63 kcal/mol for GV, whereas for GM it is 67. Thus, the singlet-triplet energy difference is 11 and 15 kcal/mol, respectively. The PM3/CI calculated electronic structures of these compounds are consistent with the observed photophysical properties. The dark binding constants of GV to calf thymus DNA ([1.1-0.08] x 10(6) M-1) are about an order of magnitude larger than those of GM ([0.24-0.018] x 10(6) M-1) at different ionic strengths (0-2.00 M NaCl). Also, the number of gilvocarcin molecules bound per base pair is smaller for GM than for GV. These differences in dark DNA binding parameters between GV and GM could have implications in the large photocytotoxic ability of GV as compared to GM.
采用吸收和发射技术对不同溶剂中吉尔vocarcin V(GV)和吉尔vocarcin M(GM)的基态(S0)、单重态(S1)和三重态(T1)进行了表征。在10%二甲基亚砜(DMSO)/水体系中观察到GV发生聚集,其二聚化常数等于7800 M-1。与相应的基态相比,这些分子S1态的光物理性质对溶剂特性变化更为敏感。GV和GM对可见光的吸收导致激发态偶极矩增大,使得荧光光谱随溶剂极性增加而发生红移。除非有水作为共溶剂,荧光量子产率随溶剂性质的变化基本保持不变。GV在DMSO中的φf和τf值均大于GM,而在10% DMSO/H2O中则观察到相反的情况。因此,与GM相比,在有水存在的情况下,GV除发射外更容易通过其他失活途径失活。GV和GM的相对磷光量子产率(φp = 0.03)和三重态能量(ET = 52 kcal/mol)相似。GV的S0 - S1能量差为63 kcal/mol,而GM为67 kcal/mol。因此,单重态 - 三重态能量差分别为11和15 kcal/mol。这些化合物经PM3/CI计算得到的电子结构与观察到的光物理性质一致。在不同离子强度(0 - 2.00 M NaCl)下,GV与小牛胸腺DNA的暗结合常数([1.1 - 0.08]×10(6) M-1)比GM([0.24 - 0.018]×10(6) M-1)大约一个数量级。此外,GM与每个碱基对结合的吉尔vocarcin分子数比GV少。GV和GM在暗DNA结合参数上的这些差异可能与GV相对于GM具有较大的光细胞毒性能力有关。