Fulop N J, Hood S, Parsons S
Department of Public Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, England.
J R Soc Med. 1997 Apr;90(4):212-5. doi: 10.1177/014107689709000408.
There has been increasing interest in the development of hospital-at-home within the National Health Service (NHS) as a way of shifting resources from secondary to primary care. We describe the development of hospital-at-home schemes in London and draw on data from an evaluation of five such schemes to discuss support for hospital-at-home within the NHS. The study has identified a small but important group of patients who do not want hospital-at-home, as well as resistance to it from some health care professionals and managers, particularly in hospitals. These organizational issues must be taken into account in any evaluation of hospital-at-home, along with issues of quality, outcome and cost. Feasibility studies are needed to identify possible organizational barriers to hospital-at-home and the development work that is required. This service innovation should not be considered in isolation from other services, but rather within the context of a wider debate about the pattern of acute care.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)内部对居家医院服务的发展兴趣日益浓厚,这是一种将资源从二级医疗转向初级医疗的方式。我们描述了伦敦居家医院服务计划的发展情况,并利用对五个此类计划的评估数据,来讨论NHS内部对居家医院服务的支持情况。该研究发现了一小部分但很重要的患者群体,他们不希望接受居家医院服务,同时一些医疗保健专业人员和管理人员,尤其是医院内部的人员,对其也存在抵触情绪。在对居家医院服务进行任何评估时,都必须考虑这些组织问题,以及质量、结果和成本等问题。需要进行可行性研究,以确定居家医院服务可能存在的组织障碍以及所需的发展工作。这种服务创新不应孤立地考虑,而应在关于急性护理模式的更广泛辩论背景下进行。