Moriwaki R, Noda M, Yajima M, Sharma B K, Numano F
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
Angiology. 1997 May;48(5):369-79. doi: 10.1177/000331979704800501.
In this retrospective review 102 Indian and 80 Japanese patients with Takayasu arteritis were compared in regard to their clinical manifestations and angiographic findings. Regardless of nationality, most patients were initially affected in their teens or twenties. Japanese patients were female in a larger ratio compared with the ratio in India. Clinically, the two groups exhibited several different features. More Japanese patients were found to be pulseless (P < 0.01) whereas many Indian patients were hypertensive (P < 0.01). Inflammatory conditions in Japanese patients were more severe (P < 0.01) and tended to be more prolonged than those in the Indians. More Japanese patients suffered from aortic regurgitation (P < 0.01), but Indians suffered from hypertension (P < 0.01). Angiographic findings revealed that the aortic arch and its branches were mainly involved in Japanese patients (type I, IIa) whereas the abdominal aorta and its branches were mainly involved in Indian patients (type IV). However, the diffusely involved type (type V) was the one most commonly found in both countries. From the analyses of vascular lesions in both Indian and Japanese patients, 510 and 396, respectively, different progressions of vasculitis are speculated. In Japanese patients, vasculitis generally occurs in the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, and/or its branches and extends into the thoracic and abdominal aorta, subsequently forming various complicated lesions with prolonged inflammatory activity. On the other hand, in Indian patients, vasculitis generally occurs in the abdominal aorta involving renal arteries, subsequently extending into the thoracic aorta within one or two decades, simple vascular lesions being formed. Data analysis suggests that this morbid condition progresses differently in India and Japan, in spite of some common etiologic factor(s).
在这项回顾性研究中,对102例印度和80例日本大动脉炎患者的临床表现和血管造影结果进行了比较。无论国籍如何,大多数患者最初发病于十几岁或二十几岁。与印度患者相比,日本患者中女性比例更高。临床上,两组表现出一些不同的特征。发现更多日本患者无脉(P<0.01),而许多印度患者患有高血压(P<0.01)。日本患者的炎症状况更严重(P<0.01),且往往比印度患者持续时间更长。更多日本患者患有主动脉反流(P<0.01),但印度患者患有高血压(P<0.01)。血管造影结果显示,日本患者主要累及主动脉弓及其分支(I型、IIa型),而印度患者主要累及腹主动脉及其分支(IV型)。然而,弥漫性受累型(V型)在两国最为常见。通过对印度和日本患者血管病变的分析,分别推测出510种和396种不同的血管炎进展情况。在日本患者中,血管炎通常发生在升主动脉、主动脉弓和/或其分支,并延伸至胸主动脉和腹主动脉,随后形成各种复杂病变,炎症活动持续时间较长。另一方面,在印度患者中,血管炎通常发生在累及肾动脉的腹主动脉,随后在一二十年内延伸至胸主动脉,形成简单血管病变。数据分析表明,尽管存在一些共同的病因,但这种疾病在印度和日本的进展有所不同。