Suppr超能文献

咖啡因强化作用:戒断反应的作用

Caffeine reinforcement: the role of withdrawal.

作者信息

Schuh K J, Griffiths R R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997 Apr;130(4):320-6. doi: 10.1007/s002130050246.

Abstract

This study examined caffeine's acute and withdrawal effects in moderate caffeine consumers (mean = 379 mg/day caffeine) to compare the relative contributions each might have to caffeine reinforcement. Subjects were caffeine restricted on the night before each of three sessions, which generally occurred at weekly intervals; these restrictions lasted until the session was completed approximately 19 h later. During the first two sessions, subjects received either placebo or caffeine (each subject's average daily intake). These two conditions occurred using a double-blind, quasi-random, crossover design. At the end of each session subjects completed the POMS, a caffeine withdrawal questionnaire, and a Multiple-Choice Form on which subjects made a series of discrete choices between receiving the drug again or receiving varying amounts of money. This form also included negative money amounts to assess how much subjects would forfeit to avoid placebo (e.g., withdrawal symptoms after placebo). During the third session, one of the previous choices was randomly selected and the consequence of that choice was implemented. Placebo increased self-reported feelings of "worn out," "headache," and "flu-like feelings," and decreased "alert," "upset stomach," "helpful," and "well-being" relative to caffeine. On the Multiple-Choice Forms, subjects chose to receive caffeine rather than an average of $0.38 and to forfeit $2.51 to avoid receiving placebo again. "Headache" was significantly correlated with amount of money forfeited to avoid placebo. These results suggest that, under these conditions, choice of caffeine is more potently controlled by avoiding withdrawal than it is by the positive effects of caffeine.

摘要

本研究考察了咖啡因对适度摄入咖啡因者(平均每日咖啡因摄入量为379毫克)的急性效应和戒断效应,以比较二者对咖啡因强化作用的相对贡献。在三个实验阶段的前一晚,受试者被限制摄入咖啡因,实验阶段通常每周进行一次;这些限制一直持续到约19小时后的实验结束。在前两个实验阶段,受试者分别接受安慰剂或咖啡因(各自的平均日摄入量)。这两种情况采用双盲、准随机、交叉设计。在每个实验阶段结束时,受试者完成了简明心境量表(POMS)、一份咖啡因戒断问卷,以及一份多项选择表,在该表中受试者要在再次服用药物或接受不同金额的金钱之间做出一系列离散选择。该表还包括负金额,以评估受试者为避免服用安慰剂(如服用安慰剂后的戒断症状)愿意放弃多少。在第三个实验阶段,随机选择之前的一个选择并实施该选择的结果。与咖啡因相比,安慰剂增加了自我报告的“疲惫”“头痛”和“流感样感觉”,并降低了“警觉”“胃部不适”“有益”和“幸福感”。在多项选择表上,受试者选择接受咖啡因而不是平均0.38美元,并愿意放弃2.51美元以避免再次服用安慰剂。“头痛”与为避免服用安慰剂而放弃的金钱数额显著相关。这些结果表明,在这些条件下,选择咖啡因更多是由避免戒断而非咖啡因的积极作用有力地控制的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验