Deane C R, Markus H S
Department of Medical Engineering and Physics, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23(3):447-52. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00224-4.
Ultrasound measurement of volume blood flow is potentially useful for many clinical situations, yet practical implementation and use are restricted by the many instrumentation and blood flow limitations that can arise. Colour velocity imaging offers a number of theoretical advantages over methods based on duplex imaging. We evaluated a colour velocity flow measurement system (CVI-Q, Philips) both in a flow phantom and in vivo in the extracranial carotid arteries of normal volunteers. Over a range of constant (50-1200 ml/min) and pulsatile (92-366 ml/min) flows and using both steered and unsteered beams with beam angles of 30 degrees and 40 degrees, errors usually within 5% were obtained for constant flow and within 10% for pulsatile flow. However, with a beam angle of 70 degrees, higher errors of 20% were obtained for pulsatile flow. The reproducibility of flow measurements made using both anterior and posterior-lateral scanning approaches was determined in the common (CCA), internal (ICA) and external carotid (ECA) arteries of 18 volunteers. A greater reproducibility was found using the posterior-lateral approach (CCA 6.27%; ICA 9.8%), and mean (SD) flow values were 376 ml/min in the CCA and 255 ml/min in the ICA. The ratio of (ICA + ECA)/CCA flow calculated for each subject individually was mean (SD) 0.95 (0.11). Insonation from an anterior approach resulted in lower reproducibility and lower flow values. In conclusion, colour flow velocity imaging allows repeatable reproducible measurements of CCA and ICA flow, but results are optimal if a posterior-lateral scanning approach is used.
超声测量血流容积在许多临床情况下可能有用,但实际应用受到诸多可能出现的仪器和血流限制的制约。与基于双功成像的方法相比,彩色速度成像具有许多理论优势。我们在血流模型以及正常志愿者的颅外颈动脉体内评估了一种彩色速度血流测量系统(CVI-Q,飞利浦公司)。在一系列恒定(50 - 1200毫升/分钟)和搏动性(92 - 366毫升/分钟)血流情况下,使用30度和40度的导向和非导向波束,对于恒定血流,误差通常在5%以内,对于搏动性血流,误差在10%以内。然而,在波束角度为70度时,搏动性血流的误差高达20%。在18名志愿者的颈总动脉(CCA)、颈内动脉(ICA)和颈外动脉(ECA)中,确定了使用前后侧扫描方法进行血流测量的可重复性。使用后侧扫描方法发现具有更高的可重复性(CCA为6.27%;ICA为9.8%),CCA的平均(标准差)血流值为376毫升/分钟,ICA为255毫升/分钟。为每个受试者单独计算的(ICA + ECA)/CCA血流比值平均(标准差)为0.95(0.11)。从前侧进行超声检查导致可重复性较低和血流值较低。总之,彩色血流速度成像允许对CCA和ICA血流进行可重复的测量,但如果使用后侧扫描方法,结果最佳。