Gassmann W, Löffler H, Thiel E, Ludwig W D, Schwartz S, Haferlach T, Maurer J, Rieder H, Fonatsch C, Gökbuget N, Hoelzer D
Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kiel, Germany.
Br J Haematol. 1997 May;97(2):372-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2171.x.
We evaluated the morphological findings in 150 consecutive cases of T-lineage acute lymphocytic leukaemia (T-ALL). Cytochemistry including PAS staining and acid phosphatase reaction proved of limited value for the diagnosis of ALL. The diagnosis of acute leukaemia was easy to establish in most instances. However, in a few cases the leukaemic cells were difficult to recognize as blasts. The nuclei of such cells showed condensed chromatin and nucleoli were lacking, and was encountered particularly in thymic ALL. Basophilic cytoplasm combined with prominent vacuolization suggestive of mature B-ALL (ALL-L3 type), was observed in 16 cases. Other features, however, such as cell size, polymorphism, chromatin structure, sparse cytoplasm or focal positivity for acid phosphatase, excluded a diagnosis of ALL-L3 in those cases. Distinction from hybrid leukaemia was difficult in 20 cases, because of a low percentage of peroxidase-positive blasts or other features which suggested a separate myeloid leukaemia component. In nine of these the hybrid nature of the leukaemia was considered as certain on the basis of morphology. Seven cases had been diagnosed as biphenotypic with coexpression of myeloid and lymphoid markers by immunological techniques. In conclusion, our analysis showed some serious pitfalls of the morphology in T-ALL, clearly indicating the need for immunological analysis of the leukaemic cells. However, morphology remains an essential component of the diagnostic repertoire, especially when the marrow is difficult to aspirate and in cases with equivocal immunological findings. Furthermore, recognition of a separate myeloid leukaemic component in addition to the lymphatic one requires a morphological analysis.
我们评估了150例连续的T系急性淋巴细胞白血病(T-ALL)的形态学表现。包括PAS染色和酸性磷酸酶反应在内的细胞化学检查对ALL的诊断价值有限。大多数情况下,急性白血病的诊断很容易确立。然而,在少数病例中,白血病细胞很难被识别为原始细胞。这类细胞的细胞核染色质浓缩且无核仁,尤其在胸腺型ALL中可见。16例患者观察到嗜碱性细胞质并伴有明显空泡化,提示为成熟B-ALL(ALL-L3型)。然而,其他特征,如细胞大小、多形性、染色质结构、细胞质稀少或酸性磷酸酶局灶性阳性,排除了这些病例为ALL-L3的诊断。20例患者难以与混合性白血病区分,因为过氧化物酶阳性原始细胞比例低或有其他提示存在独立髓系白血病成分的特征。其中9例根据形态学认为白血病的混合性质确定无疑。7例通过免疫技术诊断为双表型,同时表达髓系和淋巴系标志物。总之,我们的分析显示T-ALL形态学存在一些严重缺陷,明确表明需要对白血病细胞进行免疫分析。然而,形态学仍然是诊断方法的重要组成部分,特别是在骨髓难以抽吸以及免疫结果不明确的病例中。此外,除了淋巴系成分外,识别出独立的髓系白血病成分需要进行形态学分析。