Feldman L B, Siok W W
University at Albany, State University of New York 12222, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 May;23(3):776-81. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.3.776.
M. Taft and X. Zhu (1997) reported that character decision latencies to real Chinese characters containing components that entered into many combinations were faster than decision latencies to characters with components that entered into only a small number of combinations. However, this effect was restricted to components that appeared on the right side of Chinese characters. In written Chinese, phonetic components tend to appear on the right, and semantic components tend to appear on the left. Therefore, in Taft and Zhu's study, there was the possibility of a confound between position (left vs. right) and function (semantic vs. phonetic). Results of the present experiment show combinability effects for components with semantic and with phonetic functions. Counter to the claim by Taft and Zhu that component frequency effects are constrained by position, when component function was considered, character decision latencies varied with component frequency but not reliably with position.
M. 塔夫脱和朱晓(1997年)报告称,对于包含参与多种组合的部件的真实汉字,字符判定潜伏期比对仅参与少量组合的部件的汉字的判定潜伏期要快。然而,这种效应仅限于出现在汉字右侧的部件。在书面汉语中,语音部件往往出现在右侧,语义部件往往出现在左侧。因此,在塔夫脱和朱的研究中,存在位置(左与右)和功能(语义与语音)之间混淆的可能性。本实验结果显示了具有语义和语音功能的部件的可组合性效应。与塔夫脱和朱所声称的部件频率效应受位置限制相反,当考虑部件功能时,字符判定潜伏期随部件频率而变化,但与位置没有可靠的相关性。