Diebold J, Siegert S, Baretton G B, Suchy B, Meier W, Haas C J, Löhrs U
Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Lab Invest. 1997 May;76(5):661-70.
Extending our previous efforts to characterize ovarian neoplasms by interphase cytogenetics, we analyzed a series of 32 mucinous tumors by nonisotopic in situ hybridization with seven different centromere-specific probes as well as by flow and image DNA cytometry; we then compared the data with results of p53 and Ki67 immunohistochemistry and MYC DNA-PCR analysis and of the clinical follow-ups. Of the tumors studied, 11 of 14 (78.6%) mucinous carcinomas, 7 of 7 (100%) mucinous tumors of low malignant potential (LMP), and 7 of 11 (63.6%) mucinous cystadenomas demonstrated chromosomal aberrations. The mean number of chromosomal aberrations (+/- SD) was slightly higher in DNA cytometrically nondiploid cases than in diploid cases (2.0 +/- 1.6 versus 1.6 +/- 1.2, not significant) but did not differ significantly among the study groups (carcinomas: 1.7 +/- 1.4; tumors of LMP; 1.9 +/- 0.7; adenomas: 1.4 +/- 1.4). Aberrations affected chromosomes 1 (14 of 27 cases) and 6 (12 of 31) most frequently, followed by chromosomes 17 (7 of 28), 7 (6 of 29), and X (6 of 28). Signal gain for centromere 1, which was the most prevalent finding (13 of 27), was observed in 3 of 10 mucinous cystadenomas, 2 of 4 mucinous tumors of LMP, and 8 of 13 mucinous carcinomas. All six moderately and poorly differentiated carcinomas demonstrated this aberration. Signal gain of centromere 6 (3 of 13) and centromere 7 (4 of 13) were found only in carcinomas (p < 0.05 and p < 0.025, respectively). The interphase cytogenetic results correlated neither with proliferative activity, immunohistochemical p53 accumulation, MYC DNA amplification, nor postoperative outcome. Compared with serous ovarian neoplasms (Lab Invest 1996, 75:473-485), mucinous tumors demonstrated signal gain for chromosome 1 (p < 0.0001) and signal loss for chromosomes 6 (p < 0.001) and X (p < 0.01) significantly more often. Loss of centromere 17 was more characteristic for serous than for mucinous carcinomas (p < 0.05). Our observations show that chromosomal aberrations in mucinous ovarian neoplasms are apparently not random. These results support the notion that the molecular genetic changes in mucinous neoplasms differ from those in serous tumors.
为了进一步拓展我们之前通过间期细胞遗传学对卵巢肿瘤进行特征分析的工作,我们运用七种不同的着丝粒特异性探针,通过非同位素原位杂交技术,以及流式细胞术和图像DNA细胞计量术,对32例黏液性肿瘤进行了分析;然后我们将这些数据与p53和Ki67免疫组织化学、MYC DNA-PCR分析结果以及临床随访结果进行了比较。在所研究的肿瘤中,14例黏液性癌中的11例(78.6%)、7例低恶性潜能(LMP)黏液性肿瘤中的7例(100%)以及11例黏液性囊腺瘤中的7例(63.6%)显示出染色体畸变。DNA细胞计量学检测为非二倍体的病例中,染色体畸变的平均数量(±标准差)略高于二倍体病例(2.0±1.6对1.6±1.2,无显著差异),但在各研究组之间差异不显著(癌:1.7±1.4;LMP肿瘤:1.9±0.7;腺瘤:1.4±1.4)。畸变最常影响1号染色体(27例中的14例)和6号染色体(31例中的12例),其次是17号染色体(28例中的7例)、7号染色体(29例中的6例)和X染色体(28例中的6例)。着丝粒1信号增强是最常见的发现(27例中的13例),在10例黏液性囊腺瘤中的3例、4例LMP黏液性肿瘤中的2例以及13例黏液性癌中的8例中观察到。所有6例中分化和低分化癌均显示出这种畸变。着丝粒6信号增强(13例中的3例)和着丝粒7信号增强(13例中的4例)仅在癌中发现(分别为p<0.05和p<0.025)。间期细胞遗传学结果与增殖活性、免疫组织化学p53积聚、MYC DNA扩增以及术后结果均无相关性。与浆液性卵巢肿瘤相比(《实验医学杂志》1996年,75:473 - 485),黏液性肿瘤显示1号染色体信号增强(p<0.0001)以及6号染色体(p<0.001)和X染色体(p<0.01)信号缺失更为常见。17号着丝粒缺失在浆液性癌中比在黏液性癌中更具特征性(p<0.05)。我们的观察结果表明,黏液性卵巢肿瘤中的染色体畸变显然并非随机发生。这些结果支持了黏液性肿瘤的分子遗传学变化不同于浆液性肿瘤这一观点。