Suppr超能文献

医疗资源匮乏对全科医生转诊率差异的影响:一项对诺丁汉郡新的内科和外科门诊转诊计算机化数据的横断面研究。

The effect of deprivation on variations in general practitioners' referral rates: a cross sectional study of computerised data on new medical and surgical outpatient referrals in Nottinghamshire.

作者信息

Hippisley-Cox J, Hardy C, Pringle M, Fielding K, Carlisle R, Chilvers C

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.

出版信息

BMJ. 1997 May 17;314(7092):1458-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7092.1458.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of deprivation on variations in general practitioners' referral rates using the Jarman underprivileged area (UPA(8)) score as a proxy measure.

DESIGN

Cross sectional survey of new medical and surgical referrals from general practices to hospitals (determined from hospital activity data).

SETTING

All of the 183 general practices in Nottinghamshire and all of the 19 hospitals in Trent region.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The relation between the referral rates per 1000 registered patients and the practice population's UPA(8) score (calculated on the basis of electoral ward), with adjustment for the number of partners, percentage of patients aged over 65 years, and fundholding status of each practice.

RESULTS

There was a significant independent association between deprivation, as measured by the UPA(8) score, and high total referral rates and high medical referral rates (P < 0.0001). The UPA(8) score alone explained 23% of the total variation in total referral rates and 32% of the variation in medical referral rates. On multivariate analysis, where partnership size, fundholding status, and percentage of men and women aged over 65 years were included, the UPA(8) score explained 29% and 35% of the variation in total and medical referral rates respectively.

CONCLUSION

Of the variables studied, the UPA(8) score was the strongest predictor of variations in referral rates. This association is most likely to be through a link with morbidity, although it could reflect differences in patients' perceptions, doctors' behaviour, or the use and provision of services.

摘要

目的

以贾曼贫困地区(UPA(8))得分作为替代指标,确定贫困对全科医生转诊率差异的影响。

设计

对从全科医疗向医院转诊的新内科和外科病例进行横断面调查(根据医院活动数据确定)。

地点

诺丁汉郡的所有183家全科医疗诊所及特伦特地区的所有19家医院。

主要观察指标

每1000名注册患者的转诊率与诊所人群的UPA(8)得分(根据选区计算)之间的关系,并对合伙人数量、65岁以上患者百分比以及每家诊所的基金持有状况进行校正。

结果

以UPA(8)得分衡量的贫困与高总转诊率和高内科转诊率之间存在显著的独立关联(P < 0.0001)。仅UPA(8)得分就解释了总转诊率中23%的变异以及内科转诊率中32%的变异。在多变量分析中,纳入合伙人规模、基金持有状况以及65岁以上男性和女性的百分比后,UPA(8)得分分别解释了总转诊率和内科转诊率变异的29%和35%。

结论

在所研究的变量中,UPA(8)得分是转诊率差异的最强预测指标。这种关联很可能是通过与发病率的联系,尽管它可能反映了患者认知、医生行为或服务使用与提供方面的差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验