Parisien M, Cosman F, Morgan D, Schnitzer M, Liang X, Nieves J, Forese L, Luckey M, Meier D, Shen V, Lindsay R, Dempster D W
Helen Hayes Hospital, New York State Department of Health, West Haverstraw, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Jun;12(6):948-57. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.6.948.
While noninvasive studies of bone mass and turnover in blacks and whites abound, histologic evaluations are very rare. We have performed a comparative bone histomorphometric study of iliac biopsies from 55 healthy, premenopausal women including 21 blacks (mean age 33.4 + 1.2 years) and 34 whites (mean age 32.5 + 0.8 years) of comparable age, weight, body composition, education, and lifestyle. Biochemical indices of mineral metabolism: parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, serum ionized calcium, serum phosphorus, and urinary calcium/creatinine were measured in the fasting state. Blacks had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D (315 +/- 3.36 vs. 63.21 +/- 3.79 nmol/l, p = 0.0001). Histomorphometric indices of bone volume, structure, and connectivity were not different between groups. The following indices of bone remodeling were also similar in both groups: eroded perimeter, osteoid width, mineralizing perimeter, tissue-based bone formation rate, osteoid maturation time, active formation period, and activation frequency. However, osteoid perimeter (black [B] = 15.85 +/- 1.30 vs. white [W] = 9.49 +/- 0.70%, p = 0.0002), osteoid area (B = 2.55 +/- 0.32 vs. W = 1.39 +/- 0.12%, p = 0.003), single-labeled perimeter (B = 5.46 +/- 0.54 vs. W = 4.04 +/- 0.33%, p = 0.03), mineralization lag time (B = 38.18 +/- 4.04 vs. W = 21.83 +/- 1.60 days, p < 0.009), and total formation period (B = 148.15 +/- 19.70 vs. W = 84.04 +/- 7.62 days, p = 0.0056) were higher in blacks than in whites. The quiescent perimeter (B = 76.91 +/- 1.40 vs. W = 84.25 +/- 0.91%, p = 0.0001), mineral apposition rate (B = 0.70 +/- 0.02 vs. W = 0.75 +/- 0.02 micron/day, p = 0.066), mineralizing osteoid perimeter (B = 0.49 +/- 0.04 vs. W = 0.75 +/- 0.04%, p = 0.0001) and adjusted apposition rate (B = 0.35 +/- 0.04 vs. W = 0.58 +/- 0.04 micron3/micron2/day, p = 0.0001) were all lower in blacks than in whites. These results indicate that there are no differences in bone volume, microstructure, or turnover between black and white premenopausal women. However, there are significant differences in the mechanism of bone formation between the two groups, with a lower rate of mineralized matrix apposition within each remodeling unit and a longer total formation period in blacks than in whites. The differences appear to the result of more frequent and/or longer inactive periods in the life span of the bone formation units in blacks. These differences may allow a greater overall deposition of bone mineral in black women and therefore help explain a higher bone mass and perhaps better bone quality in black than white women.
虽然针对黑人和白人的骨量及骨转换的非侵入性研究很多,但组织学评估却非常少见。我们对55名健康的绝经前女性的髂骨活检进行了一项比较性骨组织形态计量学研究,这些女性包括21名黑人(平均年龄33.4 ± 1.2岁)和34名白人(平均年龄32.5 ± 0.8岁),她们在年龄、体重、身体组成、教育程度和生活方式方面具有可比性。在空腹状态下测量了矿物质代谢的生化指标:甲状旁腺激素、25-羟基维生素D、1,25-二羟基维生素D、血清离子钙、血清磷以及尿钙/肌酐。黑人的25-羟基维生素D水平较低(31.5 ± 3.36 vs. 63.21 ± 3.79 nmol/l,p = 0.0001)。两组之间的骨体积、结构和连通性的组织形态计量学指标没有差异。两组的以下骨重塑指标也相似:侵蚀周长、类骨质宽度、矿化周长、基于组织的骨形成率、类骨质成熟时间、活跃形成期和激活频率。然而,黑人的类骨质周长(黑人[B] = 15.85 ± 1.30 vs. 白人[W] = 9.49 ± 0.70%,p = 0.0002)、类骨质面积(B = 2.55 ± 0.32 vs. W = 1.39 ± 0.12%,p = 0.003)、单标记周长(B = 5.46 ± 0.54 vs. W = 4.04 ± 0.33%,p = 0.03)、矿化延迟时间(B = 38.18 ± 4.04 vs. W = 21.83 ± 1.60天,p < 0.009)和总形成期(B = 148.15 ± 19.70 vs. W = 84.04 ± 7.62天,p = 0.0056)均高于白人。黑人的静止周长(B = 76.91 ± 1.40 vs. W = 84.25 ± 0.91%,p = 0.0001)、矿物质沉积率(B = 0.70 ± 0.02 vs. W = 0.75 ± 0.02微米/天,p = 0.066)、矿化类骨质周长(B = 0.49 ± 0.04 vs. W = 0.75 ± 0.04%,p = 0.0001)和调整后的沉积率(B = 0.35 ± 0.04 vs. W = 0.58 ± 0.04微米³/微米²/天,p = 0.0001)均低于白人。这些结果表明,绝经前黑人女性和白人女性在骨体积、微观结构或骨转换方面没有差异。然而,两组之间在骨形成机制上存在显著差异,黑人每个重塑单元内矿化基质的沉积率较低,总形成期比白人更长。这些差异似乎是由于黑人骨形成单元寿命中更频繁和/或更长的非活跃期导致的。这些差异可能使黑人女性的骨矿物质总体沉积量更大,因此有助于解释黑人女性比白人女性具有更高的骨量以及可能更好的骨质。