Suppr超能文献

II至IV级胃食管反流病的愈合速度和症状缓解情况:一项荟萃分析。

Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chiba N, De Gara C J, Wilkinson J M, Hunt R H

机构信息

Surrey GI Clinic, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 1997 Jun;112(6):1798-810. doi: 10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9178669.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophagitis healing proportions are often incorrectly called the healing rate. The aim of this study was to compare different drug classes by expressing the speed of healing and symptom relief through a new approach.

METHODS

A fully recursive literature search to July 1996 identified 43 articles on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (7635 patients) meeting strict inclusion criteria: single- or double-blind randomized studies in adults with endoscopically proven erosive or ulcerative esophagitis. For each drug class, linear regression analysis estimated the average percentage of patients who were healed and heartburn free per week.

RESULTS

Mean overall healing proportion irrespective of drug dose or treatment duration (< or =12 weeks) was highest with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 83.6% +/- 11.4%) vs. H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs; 51.9% +/- 17.1%), sucralfate (39.2% +/- 22.4%), or placebo (28.2% +/- 15.6%). Correcting for patients without baseline heartburn, the mean heartburn-free proportion was highest with PPIs (77.4% +/- 10.4%) vs. H2RAs (47.6% +/- 15.5%). PPIs showed a significantly faster healing rate (11.7%/wk) vs. H2RAs (5.9%/wk) and placebo (2.9%/wk). PPIs provided faster, more complete heartburn relief (11.5%/wk) vs. H2RAs (6.4%/wk).

CONCLUSIONS

More complete esophagitis healing and heartburn relief is observed with PPIs vs. H2RAs and occurs nearly twice as fast. This semiquantitative expression of speed of healing and symptom relief permits comparisons for future economic evaluation and quality-of-life assessments.

摘要

背景与目的

食管炎愈合比例常被错误地称为愈合率。本研究旨在通过一种新方法来表达愈合速度和症状缓解情况,从而比较不同药物类别。

方法

截至1996年7月进行的全面递归文献检索,确定了43篇关于胃食管反流病(GERD)的文章(7635例患者),这些文章符合严格的纳入标准:针对经内镜证实为糜烂性或溃疡性食管炎的成人进行的单盲或双盲随机研究。对于每种药物类别,线性回归分析估计了每周愈合且无烧心症状的患者的平均百分比。

结果

无论药物剂量或治疗持续时间(≤12周)如何,质子泵抑制剂(PPI;83.6%±11.4%)的总体平均愈合比例最高,相比之下,H2受体拮抗剂(H2RA;51.9%±17.1%)、硫糖铝(39.2%±22.4%)或安慰剂(28.2%±15.6%)。对无基线烧心症状的患者进行校正后,PPI的平均无烧心比例最高(77.4%±10.4%),相比之下H2RA为(47.6%±15.5%)。与H2RA(5.9%/周)和安慰剂(2.9%/周)相比,PPI显示出显著更快的愈合速度(11.7%/周)。与H2RA(6.4%/周)相比,PPI能更快、更完全地缓解烧心症状(11.5%/周)。

结论

与H2RA相比,PPI能使食管炎愈合更完全、烧心症状缓解更明显,且速度快近两倍。这种愈合速度和症状缓解的半定量表达有助于未来的经济学评估和生活质量评估的比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验