Suppr超能文献

安慰剂对照生物反馈对高血压患者血压的影响。

Placebo-controlled biofeedback blood pressure effect in hypertensive humans.

作者信息

Hunyor S N, Henderson R J, Lal S K, Carter N L, Kobler H, Jones M, Bartrop R W, Craig A, Mihailidou A S

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, (Sydney), NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1997 Jun;29(6):1225-31. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.29.6.1225.

Abstract

The role of biofeedback in blood pressure control remains ill-defined because of nonspecific (placebo) effects, small study numbers, and the technical limitations of continuous pressure feedback. Clarification of its potential is awaited by those seeking a nonpharmacological approach to blood pressure control. This study examines the capability for systolic pressure lowering of 5 mm Hg or more using continuous pressure feedback in a statistical sample of untreated, well-characterized, mildly hypertensive individuals. Subjects were randomized in a double-blind study to active or placebo biofeedback. Placebo consisted of a modified contingency approach, using a partial disguise based on a digital high pass filter with 15 elements. Blood pressure-lowering capability was assessed during two laboratory sessions. Continuous visual feedback resulted in 11 of 28 subjects on active treatment and 12 of 28 on placebo treatment lowering their systolic pressure by 5 mm Hg or more (11 +/- 5.6 and 12 +/- 8.4 mm Hg, respectively; P = NS). Prestudy pressure was well-matched (153 +/- 9/97 +/- 4 and 154 +/- 8/98 +/- 4 mm Hg, respectively). An initial small difference in diurnal profile did not change. These findings indicate that among mildly hypertensive individuals, almost half can lower systolic pressure at will for short periods. This capability is independent of the real or placebo nature of the feedback signal. We conclude that there is no specific short-term biofeedback pressure-lowering capability in hypertensive individuals. Further exploration is needed to determine whether specific components of the placebo effect can be delineated, whether personality characteristics influence the response, and whether further biofeedback training can alter the outcome.

摘要

由于存在非特异性(安慰剂)效应、研究样本数量少以及连续压力反馈的技术局限性,生物反馈在血压控制中的作用仍不明确。寻求非药物血压控制方法的人们期待对其潜力有更清晰的认识。本研究在未经治疗、特征明确的轻度高血压个体的统计学样本中,使用连续压力反馈来检验收缩压降低5mmHg或更多的能力。在一项双盲研究中,受试者被随机分为接受活性生物反馈或安慰剂生物反馈。安慰剂采用改良的意外事件方法,基于具有15个元件的数字高通滤波器进行部分伪装。在两次实验室测试期间评估血压降低能力。连续视觉反馈导致接受活性治疗的28名受试者中有11名、接受安慰剂治疗的28名受试者中有12名收缩压降低了5mmHg或更多(分别为11±5.6和12±8.4mmHg;P=无显著性差异)。研究前的血压匹配良好(分别为153±9/97±4和154±8/98±4mmHg)。昼夜血压曲线最初的微小差异没有改变。这些发现表明,在轻度高血压个体中,几乎一半的人能够在短时间内随意降低收缩压。这种能力与反馈信号的真实性质或安慰剂性质无关。我们得出结论,高血压个体不存在特定的短期生物反馈降压能力。需要进一步探索以确定是否可以区分安慰剂效应的特定成分、人格特征是否影响反应以及进一步的生物反馈训练是否可以改变结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验