Osterhout L, Bersick M, McLaughlin J
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
Mem Cognit. 1997 May;25(3):273-85. doi: 10.3758/bf03211283.
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while 14 males and 14 females read sentences containing a reflexive pronoun that referred to a definitionally or stereotypically male or female antecedent noun. Pronouns that disagreed with the gender definition or gender stereotype of the antecedent elicited a large-amplitude positive wave. Violations of gender definitions elicited a larger positive wave than did violations of gender stereotypes. Furthermore, the positive wave elicited by stereotype violations persisted even when subjects judged these sentences to be acceptable. Finally, female subjects exhibited larger positivities than did male subjects, regardless of whether the gender mismatch involved a definitional or stereotypical antecedent. These results are taken to indicate that ERPs are sensitive to violations of gender-based occupational stereotypes and that the ERP response to stereotype violations is similar to the P600 effect elicited by a variety of syntactic anomalies.
在14名男性和14名女性阅读包含反身代词的句子时,记录了与事件相关的脑电位(ERP),这些句子中的反身代词指代一个在定义上或刻板印象上为男性或女性的先行名词。与先行词的性别定义或性别刻板印象不一致的代词会引发一个大幅度的正波。违反性别定义所引发的正波比违反性别刻板印象所引发的正波更大。此外,即使受试者判断这些句子是可接受的,由刻板印象违反所引发的正波仍然存在。最后,无论性别不匹配涉及的是定义上的还是刻板印象上的先行词,女性受试者所表现出的正波都比男性受试者更大。这些结果表明,ERP对基于性别的职业刻板印象的违反很敏感,并且ERP对刻板印象违反的反应类似于由各种句法异常所引发的P600效应。