Holt G R, Koch C
Computation and Neural Systems Program, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125, USA.
Neural Comput. 1997 Jul 1;9(5):1001-13. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.5.1001.
Shunting inhibition, a conductance increase with a reversal potential close to the resting potential of the cell, has been shown to have a divisive effect on subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potential amplitudes. It has therefore been assumed to have the same divisive effect on firing rates. We show that shunting inhibition actually has a subtractive effect on the firing rate in most circumstances. Averaged over several interspike intervals, the spiking mechanism effectively clamps the somatic membrane potential to a value significantly above the resting potential, so that the current through the shunting conductance is approximately independent of the firing rate. This leads to a subtractive rather than a divisive effect. In addition, at distal synapses, shunting inhibition will also have an approximately subtractive effect if the excitatory conductance is not small compared to the inhibitory conductance. Therefore regulating a cell's passive membrane conductance-for instance, via massive feedback-is not an adequate mechanism for normalizing or scaling its output.
分流抑制是一种电导增加且反转电位接近细胞静息电位的现象,已被证明对阈下兴奋性突触后电位幅度具有除法效应。因此,人们认为它对放电率也有相同的除法效应。我们表明,在大多数情况下,分流抑制实际上对放电率具有减法效应。在几个峰间期进行平均后,发放机制有效地将体细胞的膜电位钳制在一个明显高于静息电位的值,这样通过分流电导的电流大致与放电率无关。这导致了减法效应而非除法效应。此外,在远端突触处,如果兴奋性电导与抑制性电导相比不小,分流抑制也将具有大致的减法效应。因此,调节细胞的被动膜电导——例如,通过大量反馈——并不是使细胞输出正常化或缩放的充分机制。