Turcotte R, Kiteala L, Marcotte J E, Perrault H
Dept. of Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(5):425-30. doi: 10.1007/s004210050183.
The purpose of this investigation was to examine if exercise-induced arterial oxyhemoglobin desaturation selectively observed in highly trained endurance athletes could be related to differences in the pulmonary diffusing capacity (DL) measured during exercise. The DL of 24 male endurance athletes was measured using a 3-s breath-hold carbon monoxide procedure (to give DLCO) at rest as well as during cycling at 60% and 90% of these previously determined VO2max. Oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO2%) was monitored throughout both exercise protocols using an Ohmeda Biox II oximeter. Exercise-induced oxyhemoglobin desaturation (DS) (SaO2% < 91% at VO2max) was observed in 13 subjects [88.2 (0.6)%] but not in the other 11 nondesaturation subjects [NDS: 92.9 (0.4)%] (P < or = 0.05), although VO2max was not significantly different between the groups [DS: 4.34 (0.65) l/min vs NDS: 4.1 (0.49) l/min]. At rest, no differences in either DLCO [ml CO.mmHg-1.min-1: 41.7 (1.7) (DS) vs 41.1 (1.8) (NDS)], DLCO/VA [8.2 (0.4) (DS) vs 7.3 (0.9) (NDS)], MVV [l/min: 196.0 (10.4) (DS) vs 182.0 (9.9) (NDS)] or FEV1/FVC [86.3 (2.2) (DS) vs 82.9 (4.7) (NDS)] were found between groups (P > or = 0.05). However, VE/VO2 at VO2max was lower in the DS group [33.0 (1.1)] compared to the NDS group [36.8 (1.5)] (P < or = 0.05). Exercise DLCO (ml CO.mmHg-1.min-1) was not different between groups at either 60% VO2max [DS: 55.1 (1.4) vs NDS: 57.2 (2.1)] or at 90% VO2max [DS: 61.0 (1.8) vs NDS: 61.4 (2.9)]. A significant relationship (r = 0.698) was calculated to occur between SaO2% and VE/VO2 during maximal exercise. The present findings indicate that the exercise-induced oxyhemoglobin desaturation seen during submaximal and near-maximal exercise is not related to differences in DL, although during maximal exercise SaO2 may be limited by a relatively lower exercise ventilation.
本研究的目的是检验在训练有素的耐力运动员中选择性观察到的运动诱导的动脉氧合血红蛋白去饱和是否与运动期间测量的肺扩散容量(DL)差异有关。使用3秒屏气一氧化碳程序(以得出DLCO)测量24名男性耐力运动员在静息状态以及以先前测定的最大摄氧量(VO2max)的60%和90%进行骑行时的DL。在整个运动方案中使用Ohmeda Biox II血氧计监测氧合血红蛋白饱和度(SaO2%)。在13名受试者中观察到运动诱导的氧合血红蛋白去饱和(DS)(在VO2max时SaO2%<91%)[88.2(0.6)%],而在其他11名未出现去饱和的受试者[NDS:92.9(0.4)%]中未观察到(P≤0.05),尽管两组之间的VO2max无显著差异[DS:4.34(0.65)l/min vs NDS:4.1(0.49)l/min]。静息时,两组之间的DLCO[ml CO·mmHg-1·min-1:41.7(1.7)(DS)vs 41.1(1.8)(NDS)]、DLCO/VA[8.2(0.4)(DS)vs 7.3(0.9)(NDS)]、最大自主通气量(MVV)[l/min:196.0(10.4)(DS)vs 182.0(9.9)(NDS)]或第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)[86.3(2.2)(DS)vs 82.9(4.7)(NDS)]均无差异(P≥0.05)。然而,在VO2max时,DS组的VE/VO2[33.0(1.1)]低于NDS组[36.8(1.5)](P≤0.05)。在VO2max的60%[DS:55.1(1.4)vs NDS:57.2(2.1)]或90%[DS:61.0(1.8)vs NDS:61.4(2.9)]时,两组之间的运动DLCO(ml CO·mmHg-1·min-1)无差异。在最大运动期间,计算得出SaO2%与VE/VO2之间存在显著关系(r = 0.698)。目前的研究结果表明,在次最大和接近最大运动期间出现的运动诱导的氧合血红蛋白去饱和与DL差异无关,尽管在最大运动期间,SaO2可能受到相对较低的运动通气的限制。