Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的嗅探鼻吸气压力

Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Uldry C, Janssens J P, de Muralt B, Fitting J W

机构信息

Division de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1997 Jun;10(6):1292-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10061292.

Abstract

In subjects with normal lung mechanics, inspiratory muscle strength can be reliably and easily assessed by the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), which is the pressure measured in an occluded nostril during a maximal sniff performed through the contralateral nostril. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the SNIP in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), where pressure transmission from alveoli to upper airways is likely to be dampened. Twenty eight patients with COPD were studied (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 36% of predicted). The SNIP and the sniff oesophageal pressure (sniff Poes) were measured simultaneously during maximal sniffs, and were compared to the maximal inspiratory pressure obtained against an occlusion (MIP). All measurements were performed from functional residual capacity in the sitting position. The ratio SNIP/sniff Poes was 0.80, and did not correlate with the degree of airflow limitation. The ratio MIP/sniff Poes was 0.87, and the ratio SNIP/MIP was 0.97. Inspiratory muscle weakness, as defined by a low sniff Poes, was present in 17 of the 28 patients. A false diagnosis of weakness was made in eight patients when MIP was considered alone, in four when SNIP was considered alone, and in only three patients when MIP and SNIP were combined. We conclude that both the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure and the maximal inspiratory pressure moderately underestimate sniff oesophageal pressure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although suboptimal in this condition, the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure appears useful to complement the maximal inspiratory pressure for assessing inspiratory muscle strength in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

摘要

在肺力学正常的受试者中,吸气肌力量可通过嗅吸鼻吸气压力(SNIP)进行可靠且简便的评估,SNIP是在通过对侧鼻孔进行最大嗅吸时,在闭塞鼻孔中测得的压力。本研究的目的是评估SNIP在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的有效性,在这类患者中,从肺泡到上呼吸道的压力传导可能会减弱。对28例COPD患者进行了研究(一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)平均为预测值的36%)。在最大嗅吸过程中同时测量SNIP和嗅吸食管压力(嗅吸Poes),并将其与对抗闭塞获得的最大吸气压力(MIP)进行比较。所有测量均在坐位从功能残气量开始进行。SNIP/嗅吸Poes的比值为0.80,与气流受限程度无关。MIP/嗅吸Poes的比值为0.87,SNIP/MIP的比值为0.97。28例患者中有17例存在因嗅吸Poes低而定义的吸气肌无力。仅考虑MIP时,8例患者被误诊为肌无力;仅考虑SNIP时,4例患者被误诊;而同时考虑MIP和SNIP时,只有3例患者被误诊。我们得出结论,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中,嗅吸鼻吸气压力和最大吸气压力均适度低估了嗅吸食管压力。尽管在这种情况下并非最佳,但嗅吸鼻吸气压力似乎有助于补充最大吸气压力,用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸气肌力量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验