Suppr超能文献

嗅吸鼻腔吸气压力。吸气肌力量的无创评估。

Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure. A noninvasive assessment of inspiratory muscle strength.

作者信息

Héritier F, Rahm F, Pasche P, Fitting J W

机构信息

Division de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Dec;150(6 Pt 1):1678-83. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.6.7952632.

Abstract

The measurement of esophageal pressure during maximal sniffs (sniff Pes) has been shown useful to assess inspiratory muscle strength. The aim of this study was to validate a noninvasive method for estimating sniff Pes. The sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) was measured through a plug occluding one nostril during sniffs performed through the contralateral nostril. Sniff Pes was simultaneously measured with an esophageal balloon. Ten normal subjects performed 338 sniffs of variable intensity. The correlation coefficient of SNIP and sniff Pes was 0.99 +/- 0.01 (p < 0.001). The ratio SNIP/sniff Pes was 0.91 (range, 0.82 to 0.99) and the mean difference between the two measures (SNIP - sniff Pes) was -4.56 cm H2O (-1.2 to -8.6 cm H2O). Twelve patients with neuromuscular or skeletal disorders performed 181 maximal sniffs. The correlation coefficient of SNIP and sniff Pes was 0.96 +/- 0.04 (p < 0.001). The ratio SNIP/sniff Pes was 0.93 (0.77 to 1.07) and the mean difference (SNIP - sniff Pes) was -4.66 cm H2O (+0.47 to -14.26 cm H2O). Nasal mucosal congestion was induced by nebulization of increasing doses of histamine in four normal subjects. The ratio SNIP/sniff Pes was 0.93 (0.72 to 1.02) when nasal peak flow was > 100 L/min, and 0.49 (0.36 to 0.57 L/min) when nasal peak flow fell below 100 L/min. We conclude that SNIP provides a reliable and noninvasive estimation of sniff Pes in normal subjects and in patients with neuromuscular or skeletal disorders. The validity of this method may by impaired by severe nasal congestion.

摘要

最大吸气时食管压力(吸气食管压力)的测量已被证明有助于评估吸气肌力量。本研究的目的是验证一种估计吸气食管压力的非侵入性方法。通过在对侧鼻孔吸气时堵塞一个鼻孔的鼻塞来测量鼻吸气压力(SNIP)。同时用食管气囊测量吸气食管压力。10名正常受试者进行了338次不同强度的吸气。SNIP与吸气食管压力的相关系数为0.99±0.01(p<0.001)。SNIP/吸气食管压力的比值为0.91(范围为0.82至0.99),两种测量方法之间的平均差值(SNIP - 吸气食管压力)为-4.56 cmH₂O(-1.2至-8.6 cmH₂O)。12名患有神经肌肉或骨骼疾病的患者进行了181次最大吸气。SNIP与吸气食管压力的相关系数为0.96±0.04(p<0.001)。SNIP/吸气食管压力的比值为0.93(0.77至1.07),平均差值(SNIP - 吸气食管压力)为-4.66 cmH₂O(+0.47至-14.26 cmH₂O)。对4名正常受试者雾化递增剂量的组胺以诱发鼻黏膜充血。当鼻峰流量>100 L/min时,SNIP/吸气食管压力的比值为0.93(0.72至1.02),当鼻峰流量降至100 L/min以下时,该比值为0.49(0.36至0.57 L/min)。我们得出结论,SNIP能可靠且非侵入性地估计正常受试者以及患有神经肌肉或骨骼疾病患者的吸气食管压力。严重鼻塞可能会损害该方法的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验