Suppr超能文献

一份关于精子形态评估的调查问卷结果。

Results of a questionnaire on sperm morphology assessment.

作者信息

Ombelet W, Pollet H, Bosmans E, Vereecken A

机构信息

Genk Institute for Fertility Technology, ZOL Campus St Jan, Belgium.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1997 May;12(5):1015-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.5.1015.

Abstract

This survey describes the results of a questionnaire on the methodology of sperm morphology assessment. A questionnaire form was sent to 410 fertility centres. A total of 170 answer forms (41.5%) from 40 different countries was evaluated. Most responding centres (147 or 86.5%) treat more than 200 new couples per year. According to our results, a wide and complex variation in different methods of sperm preparation, staining procedures and classification systems is observed world wide. WHO recommendations for sperm preparation seem to be poorly followed. Only 86 centres (50.6%) reported the use of a single approach to both semen preparation and sperm morphology evaluation. Our results indicate an urgent need for standardization and consensus on sperm morphology methodology to regain the power of this important sperm parameter.

摘要

本调查描述了一项关于精子形态评估方法的问卷调查结果。问卷表被发送至410个生育中心。共评估了来自40个不同国家的170份答卷(41.5%)。大多数做出回应的中心(147个,即86.5%)每年接待超过200对新夫妇。根据我们的结果,在全球范围内观察到精子制备、染色程序和分类系统的不同方法存在广泛而复杂的差异。世界卫生组织关于精子制备的建议似乎很少被遵循。只有86个中心(50.6%)报告在精液制备和精子形态评估中都使用单一方法。我们的结果表明迫切需要对精子形态学方法进行标准化并达成共识,以恢复这一重要精子参数的效力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验