DeLuca J, Johnson S K, Ellis S P, Natelson B H
UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00052-0.
To examine the influence of mode of illness onset on psychiatric status and neuropsychological performance, 36 patients with CFS were divided into two groups: sudden vs gradual onset of symptoms. These two CFS subgroups were compared to each other and to sedentary healthy controls on standardized neuropsychological tests of attention/concentration, information processing efficiency, memory, and higher cortical functions. In addition, the distribution of comorbid Axis I psychiatric disease between the two CFS groups was examined. The rate of concurrent psychiatric disease was significantly greater in the CFS-gradual group relative to the CFS-sudden group. While both CFS groups showed a significant reduction in information processing ability relative to controls, impairment in memory was more severe in the CFS-sudden group. Because of the significant heterogeneity of the CFS population, the need for subgroup analysis is discussed.
为研究疾病发作方式对精神状态和神经心理学表现的影响,36例慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者被分为两组:症状突发组与症状渐发组。将这两个CFS亚组相互比较,并与久坐不动的健康对照组进行注意力/专注力、信息处理效率、记忆力及高级皮质功能的标准化神经心理学测试。此外,还研究了两种CFS组中并存的轴I精神疾病的分布情况。相对于CFS突发组,CFS渐发组中并存精神疾病的发生率显著更高。虽然两个CFS组相对于对照组均显示出信息处理能力显著下降,但CFS突发组的记忆力损害更为严重。鉴于CFS人群存在显著的异质性,文中讨论了进行亚组分析的必要性。